• Bug#1007272: ocamlcreal: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format

    From Lucas Nussbaum@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 15 09:00:02 2022
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    Source: ocamlcreal
    Version: 0.7-6
    Severity: wishlist
    Tags: bookworm sid
    Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

    Dear maintainer,

    This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2) this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

    Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
    could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
    look at other aspects as well.

    It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit identical binary packages.


    This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

    Thanks

    Lucas

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to Lucas Nussbaum on Tue Mar 15 09:30:01 2022
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:18:24 +0100
    with message-id <YjBL0D1MxUEC+l3x@seneca.home.org>
    and subject line Re: Bug#1007272: ocamlcreal: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1007272,
    regarding ocamlcreal: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1007272: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007272
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2022 07:52:13 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2018-09-13) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 115; neutral, 42; spammy,
    1. spammytokens:0.958-+--H*r:smtp
    hammytokens:0.000-+--H*RU:178.79.145.134,
    0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:xanadu.,
    0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:178.79.145.134, 0.000-+--bookworm,
    0.000-+--H*RU:sk:lucas@d
    Return-path: <lucas@debian.org>
    Received: from xanadu.blop.info ([178.79.145.134]:42998)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
    (Exi