On Jo, 18 mar 21, 08:55:43, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Holger,
On 17-03-2021 22:48, Holger Wansing wrote:
Hi,
Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote (Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:14:42 +0100):
Hi,
On 17-03-2021 22:10, Paul Gevers wrote:
I intend to commit the attached patch.
By the way, I noticed that here we're inconsistent. In most other places >> we talk about "APT source-list", but here it's "APT's source-list". I
recall we did that latter on purpose in buster. Shall I make it consistent?
Why not say something with the correct filename?
Like "APT's sources.list"
Because, sources.list is only one of the potential files, see sources.list(5). Valid are (that I know of)
/etc/apt/sources.list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/*.list
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/*.sources
Maybe something generic then, like "APT's package sources" (to avoid
confusion with APT's source).
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5E64jOIbhY42OXqk/8eFRO8iNBwFAmBTE2MACgkQ/8eFRO8i NBxiAA//TZEOhuWqi749KPs5LaDW5dqYcGfkmAJYTNBtaUliwEsc74CxYUWTMC84 UpbGm24lTEx99vCqnIRgjfbiSh19tXGUljQylyGQxJCDE/qiBN7PClKqiMV/wEaZ b/Py+UhiVO7wzqRjQmMdfSn9oM8xrU4oCggCOYYNFH1NID5o42qfmNsYC+pdjkzT DZILNYr1N39CtTs1rAqZBI1EgslOu3NNsLV8MqUXlM3pFLO4w8X2bn2B/1O6E9r5 9xR+mvnfwHbto30i5Nd5nhTclQrYDtRh2gcEbamq2BNv5r0ByREggAZmnioO6fD1 I2CCxKz9obq3QJAg868WxsZDHUHgg1o6quVCqTMsIxjr8igdhZmrNJK27wQhPOhY tR4eYirdfNDOrz60JItNCcgwxu/B4qeVa4bFjPWhwSC5rqnDIWzHSGSyGeoIcuSn 115rFRDRKGeuKrXSo+uqwOu2QKjcqowFWWh9mNNXKZ/djwpB0yY2MMPJCuGcOZF0 1bQ2Yx/qjG2Yjn+pzLE8wD4OIN77ZHL3T0b34C36diDIZwUiBzCjYBOt4vKAvZgT eYKEtbrHS1v4sb07aDIeskNUcgDdutpOnAWHO2Ht4+4O6s08/HtrCNIprtYIr9o+ tAmd0uuUJm3LHS/rKbfJ2Z81gT7bB60x6vAukYxpKs2oU1YOFBw=
=X1Y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)