• Re: amd64 running on Intel Celeron and Pentium? (was: [SECURITY] [DSA 5

    From Michael Stone@21:1/5 to piorunz on Wed Apr 13 17:10:01 2022
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:44:00PM +0100, piorunz wrote:
    On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
    You mean, that it is possible to run amd64 on my old hardware

    1#

    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 6
    model           : 22
    model name      : Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU          440  @ 2.00GHz >>stepping        : 1
    microcode       : 0x43
    cpu MHz         : 1229.629
    cache size      : 512 KB

    and

    2#

    vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
    cpu family      : 15
    model           : 2
    model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz
    stepping        : 4
    cpu MHz         : 1993.656
    cache size      : 512 KB

    ?

    And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to amd64? 
    Can this be done with the apt tools?  Then during the migrating some >>packages will be from amd64 already while others will be still i386.
    How does that go right?

    Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not sure,
    there are many models and variations of this processor. Is it socket
    LGA775 also?

    family 15 model 2 is northwood based. no amd64. the best option for that
    one is to find a cheap second hand box with a CPU that's only 10 years
    old instead of (literally) 20 years old and retire it; those old p4's
    were really power hungry, and it shouldn't be hard to find a replacement
    for a cost (maybe even free) that will pay for itself in electricity
    savings alone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piorunz@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 13 16:50:01 2022
    T24gMTIvMDQvMjAyMiAwNDo1OSwgRnJpZWRoZWxtIFdhaXR6bWFubiB3cm90ZToNCj4gWW91IG1l YW4sIHRoYXQgaXQgaXMgcG9zc2libGUgdG8gcnVuIGFtZDY0IG9uIG15IG9sZCBoYXJkd2FyZQ0K PiANCj4gMSMNCj4gDQo+IHZlbmRvcl9pZMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IEdlbnVpbmVJbnRlbA0KPiBj cHUgZmFtaWx5wqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDYNCj4gbW9kZWzCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDIy DQo+IG1vZGVsIG5hbWXCoMKgwqDCoMKgIDogSW50ZWwoUikgQ2VsZXJvbihSKSBDUFXCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgNDQwwqAgQCAyLjAwR0h6DQo+IHN0ZXBwaW5nwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqAgOiAx DQo+IG1pY3JvY29kZcKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDB4NDMNCj4gY3B1IE1IesKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqAgOiAxMjI5LjYyOQ0KPiBjYWNoZSBzaXplwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDUxMiBLQg0KPiANCj4gYW5k DQo+IA0KPiAyIw0KPiANCj4gdmVuZG9yX2lkwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIDogR2VudWluZUludGVsDQo+ IGNwdSBmYW1pbHnCoMKgwqDCoMKgIDogMTUNCj4gbW9kZWzCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6 IDINCj4gbW9kZWwgbmFtZcKgwqDCoMKgwqAgOiBJbnRlbChSKSBQZW50aXVtKFIpIDQgQ1BVIDIu MDBHSHoNCj4gc3RlcHBpbmfCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDQNCj4gY3B1IE1IesKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqAgOiAxOTkzLjY1Ng0KPiBjYWNoZSBzaXplwqDCoMKgwqDCoCA6IDUxMiBLQg0KPiANCj4g Pw0KPiANCj4gQW5kIGlmIGl0IGlzIGluZGVlZCBwb3NzaWJsZSwgaG93IGNhbiBJIHN3aXRjaCBm cm9tIGkzODYgdG8gYW1kNjQ/wqAgQ2FuIA0KPiB0aGlzIGJlIGRvbmUgd2l0aCB0aGUgYXB0IHRv b2xzP8KgIFRoZW4gZHVyaW5nIHRoZSBtaWdyYXRpbmcgc29tZSANCj4gcGFja2FnZXMgd2lsbCBi ZSBmcm9tIGFtZDY0IGFscmVhZHkgd2hpbGUgb3RoZXJzIHdpbGwgYmUgc3RpbGwgaTM4Ni4gIA0K PiBIb3cgZG9lcyB0aGF0IGdvIHJpZ2h0Pw0KDQpDZWxlcm9uIDQ0MCBmb3Igc3VyZSBpcyA2NC1i aXQuIFBlbnRpdW0gNCAyLjAwIEdIeiBJIGFtIG5vdCBzdXJlLCB0aGVyZSANCmFyZSBtYW55IG1v ZGVscyBhbmQgdmFyaWF0aW9ucyBvZiB0aGlzIHByb2Nlc3Nvci4gSXMgaXQgc29ja2V0IExHQTc3 NSBhbHNvPw0KDQpDZWxlcm9uIHN5c3RlbSBJIHN1Z2dlc3QgdG8gcmVpbnN0YWxsLiBDbGVhbiBp bnN0YWxsLCB0aGF0IGlzLiBCYWNrdXAgDQp5b3VyIC9ob21lIHBhcnRpdGlvbiBhbmQgcmVpbnN0 YWxsIHRvIERlYmlhbiAxMS4NCg0KLS0gDQpXaXRoIGtpbmRlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywgUGlvdHIuDQoN CuKigOKjtOKgvuKgu+KituKjpuKggA0K4qO+4qCB4qKg4qCS4qCA4qO/4qGBIERlYmlhbiAtIFRo ZSB1bml2ZXJzYWwgb3BlcmF0aW5nIHN5c3RlbQ0K4qK/4qGE4qCY4qC34qCa4qCL4qCAIGh0dHBz Oi8vd3d3LmRlYmlhbi5vcmcvDQrioIjioLPio4TioIDioIDioIDioIANCg==

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piorunz@21:1/5 to Michael Stone on Wed Apr 13 17:20:02 2022
    On 13/04/2022 15:57, Michael Stone wrote:

    family 15 model 2 is northwood based. no amd64. the best option for that
    one is to find a cheap second hand box with a CPU that's only 10 years
    old instead of (literally) 20 years old and retire it; those old p4's
    were really power hungry, and it shouldn't be hard to find a replacement
    for a cost (maybe even free) that will pay for itself in electricity
    savings alone.

    Ok. Yes indeed these CPUs are so old that I can give away better ones
    for free for this fellow Debian user if he is in my country.
    CPUs like that I sell on eBay from refurbished computers for almost
    zero, just as a hobby, to give it second life. Working on such machine
    is impossible apart from passive browsing and text typing.

    --
    With kindest regards, Piotr.

    ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
    ⣾â â¢ â ’⠀⣿⡠Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
    ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Stone@21:1/5 to Odo Poppinger on Wed Apr 13 18:00:01 2022
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 05:32:10PM +0200, Odo Poppinger wrote:
    I have a beloved P4 Gericom Frontman and I do not want to give it
    away.

    and that's fine, but it's increasingly unreasonable to try to run a
    modern general purpose OS on hardware that's 20 years old. if the driver
    is nostalgia, something like freedos may be a better fit, or something
    like netbsd that makes support for obscure hardware a goal, or just
    sticking with the original OS. running a suitably stripped-down debian
    install is possible, but enough work that it's just not the best tool
    for the job.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Odo Poppinger@21:1/5 to piorunz on Wed Apr 13 17:40:01 2022
    I have a beloved P4 Gericom Frontman and I do not want to give it away.
    It had a new game changing design as can today be found with many Apple computers. I also have a P4 notebook and some i386 desktops, some of
    which I am dual booting with some Windows and OS/2. New computers with a
    setup from zero are no considerable option for me. But yes, why not
    upgrade to Debian 11.

    Odo

    On 13.04.22 17:11, piorunz wrote:
    On 13/04/2022 15:57, Michael Stone wrote:

    family 15 model 2 is northwood based. no amd64. the best option for that
    one is to find a cheap second hand box with a CPU that's only 10 years
    old instead of (literally) 20 years old and retire it; those old p4's
    were really power hungry, and it shouldn't be hard to find a replacement
    for a cost (maybe even free) that will pay for itself in electricity
    savings alone.

    Ok. Yes indeed these CPUs are so old that I can give away better ones
    for free for this fellow Debian user if he is in my country.
    CPUs like that I sell on eBay from refurbished computers for almost
    zero, just as a hobby, to give it second life. Working on such machine
    is impossible apart from passive browsing and text typing.

    --
    With kindest regards, Piotr.

    ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
    ⣾â â¢ â ’⠀⣿⡠Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
    ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Levis Yarema@21:1/5 to piorunz on Wed Apr 13 19:20:01 2022
    On 13.04.22 17:11, piorunz wrote:
    On 13/04/2022 15:57, Michael Stone wrote:

    family 15 model 2 is northwood based. no amd64. the best option for that
    one is to find a cheap second hand box with a CPU that's only 10 years
    old instead of (literally) 20 years old and retire it; those old p4's
    were really power hungry, and it shouldn't be hard to find a replacement
    for a cost (maybe even free) that will pay for itself in electricity
    savings alone.

    Ok. Yes indeed these CPUs are so old that I can give away better ones
    for free for this fellow Debian user if he is in my country.
    CPUs like that I sell on eBay from refurbished computers for almost
    zero, just as a hobby, to give it second life. Working on such machine
    is impossible apart from passive browsing and text typing.


    If I would get an x64 CPU from a Linux pro, sure I would take it. Otherwise
    I would not recommend to just take any old hardware for exchange with my working one since not all of it was easily well supported by Linux these
    days, as far as I can remember.

    <div dir="ltr">On 13.04.22 17:11, piorunz wrote:<br><div>
    <span style="white-space:pre-wrap;display:block;width:98vw">&gt; On 13/04/2022 15:57, Michael Stone wrote:<br>&gt; <br>&gt;&gt; family 15 model 2 is northwood based. no amd64. the best option for that<br>&gt;&gt; one is to find a cheap second hand box
    with a CPU that&#39;s only 10 years<br>&gt;&gt; old instead of (literally) 20 years old and retire it; those old p4&#39;s<br>&gt;&gt; were really power hungry, and it shouldn&#39;t be hard to find a replacement<br>&gt;&gt; for a cost (maybe even free)
    that will pay for itself in electricity<br>&gt;&gt; savings alone.<br>&gt;&gt;<br>&gt; Ok. Yes indeed these CPUs are so old that I can give away better ones<br>&gt; for free for this fellow Debian user if he is in my country.<br>&gt; CPUs like that I
    sell on eBay from refurbished computers for almost<br>&gt; zero, just as a hobby, to give it second life. Working on such machine<br>&gt; is impossible apart from passive browsing and text typing.<br>&gt; <br></span></div><div><br></div><div>If
    I would get an x64 CPU from a Linux pro, sure I would take it.
    Otherwise I would not recommend to just take any old hardware for
    exchange with my working one since not all of it was easily well
    supported by Linux these days, as far as I can remember.<div class="gmail-adL"><br><br></div></div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Odo Poppinger@21:1/5 to Levis Yarema on Wed Apr 13 19:30:01 2022
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
    On 13.04.22 19:18, Levis Yarema wrote:

    If I would get an x64 CPU from a Linux pro, sure I would take it.
    Otherwise I would not recommend to just take any old hardware for
    exchange with my working one since not all of it was easily well
    supported by Linux these days, as far as I can remember.

       You can not replace any i386 machine with x64. Some old programs I
    am running only work with Windows XP and the serial and/or parallel
    port. Not every computer has that. However I do also need Linux, mainly
    for processing my data.
    <html>
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
    </head>
    <body>
    <p>On 13.04.22 19:18, Levis Yarema wrote:<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CACgUwoKXEDziYG=2YjvTLShST-e95XSK4Q05NQS0u5Raqdn1OA@mail.gmail.com">If
    I would get an x64 CPU from a Linux pro, sure I would take it.
    Otherwise I would not recommend to just take any old hardware for
    exchange with my working one since not all of it was easily well
    supported by Linux these days, as far as I can remember.
    <div dir="ltr">
    <div>
    <div class="gmail-adL"><br>
    </div>
    </div>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
       You can not replace any i386 machine with x64. Some old programs
    I am running only work with Windows XP and the serial and/or
    parallel port. Not every computer has that. However I do also need
    Linux, mainly for processing my data.<br>
    </body>
    </html>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Stone@21:1/5 to Levis Yarema on Wed Apr 13 21:00:02 2022
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 07:18:53PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    If I would get an x64 CPU from a Linux pro, sure I would take it. Otherwise I >would not recommend to just take any old hardware for exchange with my working >one since not all of it was easily well supported by Linux these days, as far >as I can remember.

    10 year old hardware is generally not a problem. You might have abysmal
    video performance, but so does anything with 20 year old hardware. In
    the worst case, if it doesn't work, pick different 10 year old hardware.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Levis Yarema@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 13 20:20:01 2022
    On 13.04.22 16:44, piorunz wrote:

    On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:

    And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to amd64? Can
    this be done with the apt tools? Then during the migrating some packages
    will be from amd64 already while others will be still i386. How does that
    go right?


    Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not sure, there are many models and variations of this processor. Is it socket LGA775 also?

    What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core
    2 systems to my knowledge can.

    <div dir="ltr"><div><p>On 13.04.22 16:44, piorunz wrote:<br>

    </p><blockquote type="cite">On 12/04/2022 04:59, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
    <br><blockquote type="cite">And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to amd64?  Can
    this be done with the apt tools?  Then during the migrating some
    packages will be from amd64 already while others will be still i386. 
    How does that go right?
    <br></blockquote>

    <br>
    Celeron 440 for sure is 64-bit. Pentium 4 2.00 GHz I am not sure, there
    are many models and variations of this processor. Is it socket LGA775 also?
    <br><br>
    </blockquote>
    </div><div>What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core 2 systems to my knowledge can.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Stone@21:1/5 to Levis Yarema on Wed Apr 13 21:20:02 2022
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core 2 >systems to my knowledge can.

    There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of
    the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete
    and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them.
    These systems also lack a number of security features present in modern
    CPUs; picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely
    misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most
    recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Levis Yarema@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 13 21:20:02 2022
    What security features do P3/P4/PM systems lack? I only know that the Intel
    ME was introduced with early Core 2 systems and that is well known to have security issues. Today people spend extra money for a system where you can disable the ME in the UEFI though it is only disabled by a setting then and
    can be re-enabled any time. I would prefer a computer without Intel ME.

    Am Mi., 13. Apr. 2022 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org
    :

    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that?
    Core 2
    systems to my knowledge can.

    There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of
    the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete
    and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them.
    These systems also lack a number of security features present in modern
    CPUs; picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely
    misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most
    recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010.



    <div dir="ltr">What security features do P3/P4/PM systems lack? I only know that the Intel ME was introduced with early Core 2 systems and that is well known to have security issues. Today people spend extra money for a system where you can disable the
    ME in the UEFI though it is only disabled by a setting then and can be re-enabled any time. I would prefer a computer without Intel ME.<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Mi., 13. Apr. 2022 um 21:11 Uhr schrieb
    Michael Stone &lt;<a href="mailto:mstone@debian.org">mstone@debian.org</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200,
    Levis Yarema wrote:<br>
    &gt;What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core 2<br>
    &gt;systems to my knowledge can.<br>

    There&#39;s no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of <br>
    the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete <br>
    and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them. <br>
    These systems also lack a number of security features present in modern <br> CPUs; picking an ancient chip for &quot;security reasons&quot; is likely <br> misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most <br>
    recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010.<br>

    </blockquote></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Elmar Stellnberger@21:1/5 to Paul Wise on Thu Apr 14 10:50:01 2022
    On 14.04.22 10:37, Paul Wise wrote:
    On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 05:59 +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:

    And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to
    amd64?  Can this be done with the apt tools?  Then during the
    migrating some packages will be from amd64 already while others
    will be still i386.  How does that go right?

    If your hardware supports it, you can either reinstall from scratch or cross-grade an existing install from i386 to amd64, either using the crossgrader tool or more manual methods of doing the same thing.

    https://packages.debian.org/crossgrader
    https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading


    If I had to do it, I would just upgrade to Debian 11. It is most easy
    to do and you do not need things like a crossgrader tool. Though the procedure seems somewhat difficult to me, it is interesting to know that something like crossgrading exists and where you find documentation
    about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Elmar Stellnberger@21:1/5 to Michael Stone on Thu Apr 14 14:40:01 2022
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:11:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core 2
    systems to my knowledge can.

    There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of the cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete and unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them. These
    systems also lack a number of security features present in modern CPUs; picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely misguided. Also, in the context of this thread, note that the most recent Core 2 processor was released in 2010.


    AFAIK there is just no official statement of Intel about Pentium
    III, IV and M CPUs. That may also be because they want(ed) people
    to buy newer machines. Nonetheless I would be in wonder if
    nobody at all had ever tested these CPUs for Spectre and
    Meltdown. The issue itself wasn´t discovered by Intel either.

    Elmar

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Stone@21:1/5 to Elmar Stellnberger on Thu Apr 14 15:30:01 2022
    On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 02:34:22PM +0200, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:11:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
    On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 08:18:30PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    What about Spectre /Meltdown? P3/P4/Pentium M systems don´t have that? Core 2
    systems to my knowledge can.

    There's no reason to believe netburst systems are not affected by any of the >> cpu issues identified in the past few years, but they are obsolete and
    unsupported so nobody is making official statements about them. These
    systems also lack a number of security features present in modern CPUs;
    picking an ancient chip for "security reasons" is likely misguided. Also, in >> the context of this thread, note that the most recent Core 2 processor was >> released in 2010.


    AFAIK there is just no official statement of Intel about Pentium
    III, IV and M CPUs. That may also be because they want(ed) people
    to buy newer machines. Nonetheless I would be in wonder if
    nobody at all had ever tested these CPUs for Spectre and
    Meltdown. The issue itself wasn´t discovered by Intel either.

    There's a general class of problems related to how CPUs handle various
    checks while executing out of order or speculative instructions. The
    specifics of how to exploit the vulnerabilities varies in different CPU implementations, and new techniques are identified pretty regularly. Previous-gen atom processors weren't affected by most of this because
    they were strictly in-order. (Intel still supports those, and has issued
    "not vulnerable" statements for many of the CPU problems.) The netburst (pentium 4) architecture, by contrast, was out-of-order and had a huge
    pipeline (some even supported hyperthreading, which has been a whole bag
    of problems in itself.) It's really hard to believe that intel managed
    to get everything right 25 years ago in netburst and then just forgot
    how to do it with later generations. More plausibly, nobody is spending
    a lot of time researching how to exploit flaws in an architecture that
    is functionally obsolete. There's been a lot of wild speculation that
    Pentium 4 was some kind of high point for "secure" CPUs, but that's
    coming from internet pontificators rather than serious researchers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Levis Yarema@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 14 15:50:01 2022
    Is there in deed any reason to prefer amd64 over i586 if you have the
    choice and a machine with 2GB RAM or less, apart from perhaps long term support?

    Am Do., 14. Apr. 2022 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>:

    On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 05:59 +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:

    And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to
    amd64? Can this be done with the apt tools? Then during the
    migrating some packages will be from amd64 already while others
    will be still i386. How does that go right?

    If your hardware supports it, you can either reinstall from scratch or cross-grade an existing install from i386 to amd64, either using the crossgrader tool or more manual methods of doing the same thing.

    https://packages.debian.org/crossgrader
    https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading

    --
    bye,
    pabs

    https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


    <div dir="ltr">Is there in deed any reason to prefer amd64 over i586 if you have the choice and a machine with 2GB RAM or less, apart from perhaps long term support?</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Do., 14. Apr.
    2022 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Paul Wise &lt;<a href="mailto:pabs@debian.org">pabs@debian.org</a>&gt;:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Tue, 2022-04-12 at 05:
    59 +0200, Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:<br>

    &gt; And if it is indeed possible, how can I switch from i386 to <br>
    &gt; amd64?  Can this be done with the apt tools?  Then during the <br>
    &gt; migrating some packages will be from amd64 already while others <br>
    &gt; will be still i386.  How does that go right?<br>

    If your hardware supports it, you can either reinstall from scratch or<br> cross-grade an existing install from i386 to amd64, either using the<br> crossgrader tool or more manual methods of doing the same thing.<br>

    <a href="https://packages.debian.org/crossgrader" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://packages.debian.org/crossgrader</a><br>
    <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading</a><br>

    -- <br>
    bye,<br>
    pabs<br>

    <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise</a><br>
    </blockquote></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Elmar Stellnberger@21:1/5 to Lennart Sorensen on Fri Apr 15 09:10:02 2022
    On 15.04.22 04:50, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
    On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 03:45:37PM +0200, Levis Yarema wrote:
    Is there in deed any reason to prefer amd64 over i586 if you have the
    choice and a machine with 2GB RAM or less, apart from perhaps long term
    support?

    Twice the registers and sse instructions for fpu rather than x87?


    That is not correct. You can make use of SSE instructions also in x86_32/i386 mode.

    I found f.i.:
    https://gcc.gcc.gnu.narkive.com/k0KqaZF2/i386-sse-test-question

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)