On Debian stable, I have chromium Version: 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10u3

From Arch advisory on 2020-10-10:

The package chromium before version 86.0.4240.75-1 is vulnerable to
multiple issues including arbitrary code execution, access restriction
bypass, information disclosure and insufficient validation. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-security/2020-October/001608.html

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

17 oct. 2020 à 14:28 de gguninski@gmail.com:

On Debian stable, I have chromium Version: 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10u3

From Arch advisory on 2020-10-10:

The package chromium before version 86.0.4240.75-1 is vulnerable to
multiple issues including arbitrary code execution, access restriction bypass, information disclosure and insufficient validation. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-security/2020-October/001608.html

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

I would say yes for the time being indeed: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/chromium
See "vulnerable" in 2nd column for CVE-2020-15967 to CVE-2020-15992 + CVE-2020-6557

Best regards,
l0f4r0

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/04/google_chrome_critical_updates/

Wed 4 Nov 2020
If you're an update laggard, buck up: Chrome zero-days are being
exploited in the wild

Desktop and Android versions both at risk

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:31 PM <l0f4r0@tuta.io> wrote:

Hi,

17 oct. 2020 à 14:28 de gguninski@gmail.com:

On Debian stable, I have chromium Version: 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10u3

From Arch advisory on 2020-10-10:

The package chromium before version 86.0.4240.75-1 is vulnerable to multiple issues including arbitrary code execution, access restriction bypass, information disclosure and insufficient validation. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-security/2020-October/001608.html

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

I would say yes for the time being indeed: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/chromium
See "vulnerable" in 2nd column for CVE-2020-15967 to CVE-2020-15992 + CVE-2020-6557

Best regards,
l0f4r0

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Georgi Guninski,

what is your opinion, what should Linux users use for their daily work?
Firefox becomes more and more buggier, Chromium project doesn't provide binaries for any OS.

Kind regards
Georgi

On 11/8/20 7:50 PM, Georgi Guninski wrote:

https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/04/google_chrome_critical_updates/

Wed 4 Nov 2020
If you're an update laggard, buck up: Chrome zero-days are being
exploited in the wild

Desktop and Android versions both at risk

On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:31 PM <l0f4r0@tuta.io> wrote:

Hi,

17 oct. 2020 à 14:28 de gguninski@gmail.com:

On Debian stable, I have chromium Version: 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10u3

From Arch advisory on 2020-10-10:

The package chromium before version 86.0.4240.75-1 is vulnerable to
multiple issues including arbitrary code execution, access restriction
bypass, information disclosure and insufficient validation.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-security/2020-October/001608.html

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

I would say yes for the time being indeed: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/chromium
See "vulnerable" in 2nd column for CVE-2020-15967 to CVE-2020-15992 + CVE-2020-6557

Best regards,
l0f4r0

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:31 PM Georgi Naplatanov <gosho@oles.biz> wrote:

Chromium project doesn't provide
binaries for any OS.

Aren't these trustworthy daily builds?:

https://download-chromium.appspot.com/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

8 nov. 2020 à 18:50 de gguninski@gmail.com:

https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/04/google_chrome_critical_updates/

Wed 4 Nov 2020
If you're an update laggard, buck up: Chrome zero-days are being
exploited in the wild

Desktop and Android versions both at risk

Thanks Georgi for the link.

Regarding CVE-2020-16009 <https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009>, it seems that some distros like Arch [1] have already updated their chromium packages but no Debian yet. Right?

Is it just a matter of extracting the security fix from 86.0.4240.183, packaging it accordingly and pushing in a new version in Debian repositories?

For Buster, will it lead eventually to a 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10uX or a 86.0.4240.183~deb10uX version instead?

Thanks in advance & Best regards,
l0f4r0

[1] : https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

You can follow debian's progress on this here:

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-16009

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 20:46 +0100, l0f4r0@tuta.io wrote:

Regarding CVE-2020-16009 <https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009>, it seems that some distros like Arch [1] have already updated their chromium packages but no Debian yet. Right?

Is it just a matter of extracting the security fix from 86.0.4240.183, packaging it accordingly and pushing in a new version in Debian repositories?

For Buster, will it lead eventually to a 83.0.4103.116-1~deb10uX or a 86.0.4240.183~deb10uX version instead?

Thanks in advance & Best regards,
l0f4r0

[1] : https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:15 AM Lou Poppler <LouPoppler@cableone.net> wrote:

You can follow debian's progress on this here:

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-16009

Hi, thanks for the link.
I think your advice is incomplete and we should monitor
the union of all vulnerabilities and CVEs, not just one. There was similar
link in this thread, check it.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:46 PM <l0f4r0@tuta.io> wrote:

Regarding CVE-2020-16009 <https://security.archlinux.org/CVE-2020-16009>, it seems that some distros like Arch [1] have already updated their chromium packages but no Debian yet. Right?

Right.

Is it just a matter of extracting the security fix from 86.0.4240.183, packaging it accordingly and pushing in a new version in Debian repositories?

There are more than one vulnerabilities to fix.

I have about 10 years experience consulting Mozilla for
their browsers and I recommend Debian to update to
the closest to Chromium stable. Definitely not all security
bugs get CVE and some CVEs are "multiple vulnerabilities in X".

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

So debian are distributing vulnerable Chromium since nearly
a month? There is exploit (not sure about which OSes) in the
wild.

Debian are not commenting on this on this mailing list.

Right?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 17.10.20 14:28, Georgi Guninski wrote:

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

Yes. The Team maintaining Chromium in Debian is clearly overloaded and understaffed and I am sure the Corona Crisis isn't helping here.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hello,

I'm sorry for jumping in; just wanted to mention that other packages are vulnerable in stable/testing/sid/oldstable. BUT we should not forget to
say a THANK YOU to these guys which give their best in order all of us
to use this OS for free ;-)

Regards

Pavlos

*
*

*Pavlos Ponos*

Visit my Linkedin profile <https://www.linkedin.com/in/pavlos-k-ponos>
and my blog <https://pavlosponosblog.wordpress.com/>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Privacy isn't about hiding bad things.
It's about protecting what defines us as human beings.
Protect yourself by using TOR browser
<https://www.torproject.org/download/>, OpenPGP encryption <https://www.openpgp.org/>, Jitsi Meet <https://meet.jit.si/> & Signal <https://www.signal.org/>
Save your money by using a Linux distro <https://distrowatch.com/> & an open-source Office suite <https://www.libreoffice.org/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 11/13/20 10:01 AM, Sven Hartge wrote:

On 17.10.20 14:28, Georgi Guninski wrote:

Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?

Yes. The Team maintaining Chromium in Debian is clearly overloaded and understaffed and I am sure the Corona Crisis isn't helping here.

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hello,</font></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I'm sorry for jumping
in; just wanted to mention that other packages are vulnerable in
stable/testing/sid/oldstable. BUT we should not forget to say a
THANK YOU to these guys which give their best in order all of us
to use this OS for free <span class="moz-smiley-s3"><span>;-)</span></span><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Regards</font><font
face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Pavlos</font></p>
<div class="moz-signature">
<p><small><strong><br>
</strong></small></p>
<p><small><strong>Pavlos Ponos</strong><br>
<br>
Visit my <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/pavlos-k-ponos">Linkedin
profile</a> and <a
href="https://pavlosponosblog.wordpress.com/">my blog</a></small></p>
<p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<small> Privacy isn't about hiding bad things.<br>
It's about protecting what defines us as human beings.<br>
Protect yourself by using <a
href="https://www.torproject.org/download/">TOR browser</a>,
<a href="https://www.openpgp.org/">OpenPGP encryption</a>, <a
href="https://meet.jit.si/">Jitsi Meet</a> &amp; <a
href="https://www.signal.org/">Signal</a><br>
Save your money by using a <a href="https://distrowatch.com/">Linux
distro</a> &amp; an open-source <a
href="https://www.libreoffice.org/">Office suite</a><br>
</small> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/13/20 10:01 AM, Sven Hartge
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:199e64ce-e9bc-d97d-1535-88e9e2ca6766@svenhartge.de">On
17.10.20 14:28, Georgi Guninski wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Is Debian's chromium vulnerable now?
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes. The Team maintaining Chromium in Debian is clearly overloaded
and understaffed and I am sure the Corona Crisis isn't helping
here.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hello,

Pavlos Ponos (Fri 2020-11-13 10:20:36 +0200) :

BUT we should not forget to say a THANK YOU to these guys

and gals

which give their best in order all of us to use this OS for free ;-)

I was about to write the same thing: a big thank you to all
volunteers.

--
Emmanuel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

some brain storming: what about working together with the LinuxMint
people, they just got a dedicated compiling machine, just for getting
updated Chromium for LMDE in time:

http://packages.linuxmint.com/list.php?release=Debbie

Consolidating resources might do the trick here,

Kind regards, Joerg.

On 11/13/20 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:

Hello,

Pavlos Ponos (Fri 2020-11-13 10:20:36 +0200) :

BUT we should not forget to say a THANK YOU to these guys

and gals

which give their best in order all of us to use this OS for free ;-)

I was about to write the same thing: a big thank you to all
volunteers.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:21 AM Pavlos Ponos <pavlos.ponos@gmail.com> wrote:

BUT we should not forget to say a THANK YOU to these guys which give their best in order all of us to use this OS for free ;-)

I believe I am debian contributor too, search in google for:
"georgi guninski" site:debian.org

Definitely won't say "thank you" to some entity which gives
me long unpatched important component like a web browser.

It is like saying "thank you" to someone who gives
you free licensed Windows XP, lol.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

13 nov. 2020 à 11:06 de gguninski@gmail.com:

Definitely won't say "thank you" to some entity which gives
me long unpatched important component like a web browser.

I confess that having an unpatched browser is really not recommended because of all exploits that could happen on the fly (the browser is a really exposed component by nature).

However, everyone is free to contribute, provide help or simply choose another package, maybe more maintained...

9 nov. 2020 à 17:30 de gosho@oles.biz:

what is your opinion, what should Linux users use for their daily work? Firefox becomes more and more buggier, Chromium project doesn't provide binaries for any OS.

Why not using Vivaldi browser then?
It comes with its own repo and updates are released regularly.
This is not 100% open source, true, but it's really functional & customisable. I've been using it for 1 year on Linux/macOS/Windows and heard/read almost only good feedbacks.

Best regards,
l0f4r0

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)