* Package name : systemd-boot-installer
On 6/3/24 09:33, Luca Boccassi wrote:
* Package name : systemd-boot-installer
Can this be merged into the normal systemd source package?
* Package name : systemd-boot-installerCan this be merged into the normal systemd source package?
I feel like from a d-i perspective that'd be highly unusual? Having the purely d-i-specific components be owned by d-i is the common setup.
On 6/3/24 15:33, Philipp Kern wrote:of the installer (especially for translations etc.).
* Package name : systemd-boot-installerCan this be merged into the normal systemd source package?
I feel like from a d-i perspective that'd be highly unusual? Having the purely d-i-specific components be owned by d-i is the common setup.
If it doesn't make sense to merge it (i.e. because it is a glue package between two unstable interfaces), then that is fine, but I think that the interfaces on both the d-i and the systemd side are stable enough.
From the d-i side we've generally preferred to have all the UI be part
From the d-i side we've generally preferred to have all the UI be partof the installer (especially for translations etc.).
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 339 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 00:16:26 |
Calls: | 7,466 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,691 |
Messages: | 5,627,864 |