Hi,

Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:

Closing this non-bug.

Maybe that indeed was too harsh, I apologize.


But you could have explained what you mean in a polite way instead of
starting directly with ad-hominem attacks on a public list?

The non-bug that should be closed is your brain pretending a RC bug
doesn't exist, especially since you fully knew it was a bug, and you
closed it just because it bothers you having a RC one in the package.

No, I wasn't. And there's no RC bug here anyway. I closed it because I
thought before/after is what you meant with between. And that is
definitely there. Now that you say there's something else you mean
(please describe it exactly so I forward it upstream), that is someting
else.

If you don't want to maintain the package leave the position for other
who does, and stop ruining Debian's Quality and bothering me.

Thanks, but I *want* to maintain the package and I *do* maintain the
package.


Regards,


Rene

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Good evening,

José Luis González <bugs.jlg@gmail.com> wrote on 07/04/2024 at 20:59:53+0200:

Hi all,

Rene Engelhard seems to be a worse case even than Ricardo Mones. Take a
look at my recent bug reports to libreoffice-writer and his replies.

Your attitude is not okay, be it in this mail or in the sylpheed thread
you sent earlier.

This mail is therefore a friendly request for you to stop and find other
ways of expressing disagreement.

Regards,
--
PEB

--==-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEE5CQeth7uIW7ehIz87iFbn7jEWwsFAmYTGLIPHHBlYkBkZWJp YW4ub3JnAAoJEO4hW5+4xFsLX3wP/j+oDiw/ujRoFS1+b3hgo5v2gv3nYXpuWUha MSrtRRwS+nYYevaBJ8e1DOEsAKqCN6jkMl+ZOVi4HdxZViYYf/84bktUlPzkFKJu kVE9F4jgvxpei4i27y0V/BGw7l15i6LNAneRAtFOhqOF9Fb92FKlMJ/ukeuLfUOG zI04UtD6ILPFqSxR3rpHlqhSQxOjqwBcPFNT8JL/7l+E94Uk3oY/vSGEf4CcBaQv YGp153Ndsn02q/32f842UuCbt9YTQMuuzxZrRwFvyVtrFRjvcbrsrGtmmFP8D20R A6qBOioBBQn6t15H9IMCCyMhwf3sggjqAJkcbHe/r0pc8AzgR7JiRE0tuquJHxL3 oCBToGI6zhTqsYo3CIV0RmliW8fwcSn/XSKcjM46qrInLNpBc3bdad4to+ZQOrqv KF3ACGCA5/+b2WN/mMUy2ZTF6J68BtBKK4dmEoyInDI3CSeA//xWUCtqrhXxwlOa 1Jjiyj7NferROjI8D1m072ImiT2He9iEaDBwFpKyaBIXm4poaWm3gha/VSfuoNSA BaOwy2HuqNu20yW0P+yvbpRBhOUwDyQmBkL63gxufZwRAjZ1RBXW+XJw7Ly8h+2p wL1cO7D320qwmY0/oqTGGd0MgIcACyd2tkeq3EiCZ/4/X+tbnzZpk9t8yPUcqfSN
WXWvOi1O
=gbFR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

* José Luis González <bugs.jlg@gmail.com> [240407 15:00]:

reopen 1068479
thanks

Hi all,

Rene Engelhard seems to be a worse case even than Ricardo Mones. Take a
look at my recent bug reports to libreoffice-writer and his replies.

In this one:

Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:

Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:

The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.

?

It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before".

I meant spacing between paragraphs, not spacing after and before
paragraphs. The report was crystal clear.

The difference, for those who didn't realize is space after paragraph
happens always, and between only between them, being the regular
separation between paragraphs (the other is formatting, and isn't
useful as a substitute because it adds something undesirable at the end
of the document or between paragraphs and other kinds of block
elements).

First, please carefully consider the reply from Pierre-Elliott Bécue.
The tone of your email is way out of line. If this is the way you
regularly communicate, I would not be surprised that Rene closes your
bug reports.

It is clear to me from your quote of Rene's response that Rene honestly believed he was answering your question and the bug should be closed.
Politely expressing the difference between the current behavior and what
you were asking for, and at the same time reopening the bug (at a proper severity), would have been appropriate. It should have been done in the
bug tracker and _not_ on this list. I've set Reply-To to the bug report
only.

I don't use libreoffice daily, but I do use it. If this is a case that lowriter already has a way to obtain "between" spacing, but it is just
not in the proper dialog box, then this is a "normal" bug at most,
possibly "minor". However, I don't believe lowriter ever had such a
feature. If this is the case, the severity is "wishlist", and not
higher. (If it does have this feature, I would personally be interested
in how to do it!)

In no way would I consider this an "important" bug, and absolutely not "serious" or RC.

All missing or not-yet-implemented features might be considered to have
a "major effect on usability" by someone, but in almost all cases, such
a feature request is still only a "wishlist" bug. Please don't confuse
the difference between how you would like the software to behave and how
it is currently designed to behave as being anything more than a feature request, regardless of how important you believe the feature is.

...Marvin

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)