Hi!

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.

What web technology should I use? My first choice is vuejs/vuetify/express/typeorm, but vuetify and typeorm are not packaged
for debian. Is it difficult to add them to debian? My second choice is
be django/bootstrap/jquery. They are packaged for debian but it's not as
modern as vuejs.

What do you recommend?

Thank you very much!

Regards, Andy

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,


Le ven. 9 déc. 2022 à 13:13, Andreas Josef Heil <andy.jh92@mailbox.org> a écrit :

Hi!

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.

What web technology should I use? My first choice is vuejs/vuetify/express/typeorm, but vuetify and typeorm are not packaged
for debian. Is it difficult to add them to debian? My second choice is
be django/bootstrap/jquery. They are packaged for debian but it's not as modern as vuejs.

What do you recommend?

Could you ask this to pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net ?

Thanks,
Jérémy

<div dir="ltr">Hi,<br><br><br>Le ven. 9 déc. 2022 à 13:13, Andreas Josef Heil &lt;<a href="mailto:andy.jh92@mailbox.org">andy.jh92@mailbox.org</a>&gt; a écrit :<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Hi!<br>&gt;<br>&gt; I&#39;d like to develop a free software web app and I
wanne be the debian<br>&gt; maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; What web technology should I use? My first choice is<br>&gt; vuejs/vuetify/express/typeorm, but vuetify and typeorm are not packaged<br>
&gt; for debian. Is it difficult to add them to debian? My second choice is<br>&gt; be django/bootstrap/jquery. They are packaged for debian but it&#39;s not as<br>&gt; modern as vuejs.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; What do you recommend?<br><br><br>Could you ask this
to <a href="mailto:pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net">pkg-javascript-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net</a> ?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Jérémy</div>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.

What web technology should I use?

Personally I would suggest to focus on static site generators,
that only produce web pages that utilise progressive enhancement.
This sort of web site is more performant for users, more flexible
for hosting and easier to archive at the end of life of the website.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_site_generator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

If possible I would consider making it a Linux desktop app instead.

--
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmOT9CgACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaMHnA//f0ayoOYRG52sws+gnbrenIKJSU02/OLZjso8ZmIEH3udhzXoBFeXQJLW r1VXPBl5MY1UNmdUXxTmc59xyk0gyjrVUzR2NmcS4Zmkz6/Kb0KFGqiKA+bCriKJ WuF6R3QS9PA9+Ih6Isx7Zi+eoLsrB8192JQF45ZzXQclDjOff9iasty78dvLFWKg oA66oyzeLc2ykP5ZzR4PqHLggx3UXuq3HZUPVh+Oqvl0B+bLhYWcKc//f67ZMcp8 fAzTJXNu9upoJ0xFLbRbbUEe/Z24Bxw2/xHYpmrYmLCgQsC1Md2l2mdwMefL9Cz1 199Sx9PqX2a5c8JfzO0V2cMhE3iPTDhDUEQOktF3JeBX+SRPioszp/5eI7lf7KCy AMRnfAXY0nl9DsvXRGE7JTaNMKpUAInFaSYIDz8bdniZR+4bU/ooSdpx3ZHqvQzL fkME04ypN0Ok/HOZeYEMibh2IGK3QZAfIl3pWgqYirycNczodntTKjX2QGdd5p7x cHuyR6FNvKXZgDH1sWEBFXmUSpa7yvRt6EQ5KUEqkb7AwRhbUPyo3dxZbp7zygPn G4KSFOY/SNlPJPRY8wC3fLgqEWWkHBLMD8EfBY6AxhfWW5ZMhMxzI0nvp7C/RiEM Jgql5LWnwdYZOXricuVRpnobhkwei9xLMt+SArMkbwPhP7bQgFw=
=LW96
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Quoting Paul Wise (2022-12-10 03:51:20)

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox.

What web technology should I use?

Personally I would suggest to focus on static site generators,
that only produce web pages that utilise progressive enhancement.
This sort of web site is more performant for users, more flexible
for hosting and easier to archive at the end of life of the website.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_site_generator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

If possible I would consider making it a Linux desktop app instead.

I fully agree with Pabs.

On top of that, I would suggest to consider not only more sustainable
_content_ production and consumption through the above methods, but also
more sustainable _application_ production and consumption: Avoid
reinventing wheels by breaking the task into components that process
content via the Micropub standard and other Indieweb mechanisms, and
then reuse existing components and write only components missing.

E.g. if you like to code in Perl, then write a Micropub plugin for
existing static site generator Ikiwiki already part of FreedomBox, so
that everyone already using Ikiwiki (not only FreedomBox users) can edit
their content natively e.g. using exisitng Android app Indigenous.

Or if you like to code in PHP, then write a Micropub plugin for
Mediawiki, (less sustainable but) also already part of FreedomBox.

Or maybe skip coding from scratch altogether and instead package
existing plugin and theme for Wordpress, (also less sustainable but)
already already part of FreedomBox.

Or if you like to code in Python, then write a Micropub plugin for
Radicale, translating between ical data and Micropub Event data.
Radicale is already in FreedomBox.

Or maybe write a Micropub media endpoint that hooks into Matrix,
enabling Micropub-based editors like Indigenous to reuse images and
videos posted in Matrix rooms. Matrix server is already in FreedomBox.


https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/micropub/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/indieweb/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.indieweb.indigenous/ http://microformats.org/wiki/h-event https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/#media-endpoint


- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
* Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private --==============r06083022828425953=MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: signature
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"; charset="us-ascii"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmOUWgoACgkQLHwxRsGg ASFFRA//QPrX88NFLiPTtfYoEe32sOE6dTRGsahK2zAuB4vAH2GmxUSaO7cddVuk DBSKrpJlgvQv58Hx0NpVoNv7QnnPMn0x0DJlo2PYgK7STIxDIitgFyjNriHF62Uy pXyt4PrH7IZMCRfzNfy0LWNg8jFV+FmVwh4bLEAb7lZoKP4MQ/OpRJC8oZmEyVAl BRutJYkb8nEdTn70gy7SrSit4VCM9i78ENu9WrHg6HbOkxHVLISMBi02UO+vS+QU DmLE/3wXq4fmf73jTm4mhrkXbjLxNEC9YzzebGjckQxs3vufVcFtaJLzKghbU/Tu HzCoi0+vJDI6D5JsU9aUntr/QuBMoqIdHH0mJhA8JjSTmGe4doOU1keUTAC1SRpu bqGjdCvjbm3gDnC24UPMWC0rDUkFmb8puHWJpZDXJpVON26xUGyvEKSpeG56WC0r r99wNGbC5SHiuRtQzZu7EQk8PP0MMmwvf+5eUuSd

I think static site generators as well as indie web technology is more
about websites and social networking, but I wan't a highly interactive
web app, preferable a single page application. Is there no javascript
spa framework/lib with a full featured ui library for debian? Vuejs is
packaged for debian but not vuetifiy. Is it lot of work to package vuetify?

On 10.12.22 11:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

Quoting Paul Wise (2022-12-10 03:51:20)

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und freedombox. >>>
What web technology should I use?

Personally I would suggest to focus on static site generators,
that only produce web pages that utilise progressive enhancement.
This sort of web site is more performant for users, more flexible
for hosting and easier to archive at the end of life of the website.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_site_generator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

If possible I would consider making it a Linux desktop app instead.

I fully agree with Pabs.

On top of that, I would suggest to consider not only more sustainable _content_ production and consumption through the above methods, but also
more sustainable _application_ production and consumption: Avoid
reinventing wheels by breaking the task into components that process
content via the Micropub standard and other Indieweb mechanisms, and
then reuse existing components and write only components missing.

E.g. if you like to code in Perl, then write a Micropub plugin for
existing static site generator Ikiwiki already part of FreedomBox, so
that everyone already using Ikiwiki (not only FreedomBox users) can edit their content natively e.g. using exisitng Android app Indigenous.

Or if you like to code in PHP, then write a Micropub plugin for
Mediawiki, (less sustainable but) also already part of FreedomBox.

Or maybe skip coding from scratch altogether and instead package
existing plugin and theme for Wordpress, (also less sustainable but)
already already part of FreedomBox.

Or if you like to code in Python, then write a Micropub plugin for
Radicale, translating between ical data and Micropub Event data.
Radicale is already in FreedomBox.

Or maybe write a Micropub media endpoint that hooks into Matrix,
enabling Micropub-based editors like Indigenous to reuse images and
videos posted in Matrix rooms. Matrix server is already in FreedomBox.

https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/micropub/ https://wordpress.org/plugins/indieweb/ https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.indieweb.indigenous/ http://microformats.org/wiki/h-event https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/#media-endpoint

- Jonas

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.

Regards, Andy

On 12.12.22 18:01, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I think static site generators as well as indie web technology is more
about websites and social networking, but I wan't a highly interactive
web app, preferable a single page application. Is there no javascript
spa framework/lib with a full featured ui library for debian? Vuejs is packaged for debian but not vuetifiy. Is it lot of work to package
vuetify?

On 10.12.22 11:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

Quoting Paul Wise (2022-12-10 03:51:20)

On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:12 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I'd like to develop a free software web app and I wanne be the debian
maintainer for it. It should be fully integrated to debian und
freedombox.

What web technology should I use?

Personally I would suggest to focus on static site generators,
that only produce web pages that utilise progressive enhancement.
This sort of web site is more performant for users, more flexible
for hosting and easier to archive at the end of life of the website.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_site_generator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement

If possible I would consider making it a Linux desktop app instead.

I fully agree with Pabs.

On top of that, I would suggest to consider not only more sustainable
_content_ production and consumption through the above methods, but also
more sustainable _application_ production and consumption: Avoid
reinventing wheels by breaking the task into components that process
content via the Micropub standard and other Indieweb mechanisms, and
then reuse existing components and write only components missing.

E.g. if you like to code in Perl, then write a Micropub plugin for
existing static site generator Ikiwiki already part of FreedomBox, so
that everyone already using Ikiwiki (not only FreedomBox users) can edit
their content natively e.g. using exisitng Android app Indigenous.

Or if you like to code in PHP, then write a Micropub plugin for
Mediawiki, (less sustainable but) also already part of FreedomBox.

Or maybe skip coding from scratch altogether and instead package
existing plugin and theme for Wordpress, (also less sustainable but)
already already part of FreedomBox.

Or if you like to code in Python, then write a Micropub plugin for
Radicale, translating between ical data and Micropub Event data.
Radicale is already in FreedomBox.

Or maybe write a Micropub media endpoint that hooks into Matrix,
enabling Micropub-based editors like Indigenous to reuse images and
videos posted in Matrix rooms.  Matrix server is already in FreedomBox.


https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/micropub/
https://wordpress.org/plugins/indieweb/
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.indieweb.indigenous/
http://microformats.org/wiki/h-event
https://www.w3.org/TR/micropub/#media-endpoint


  - Jonas

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.

QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page
web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be
more accessible than a QT app even today.
I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux
desktop accessibility, although both are usable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 18:01 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I wan't a highly interactive web app, A desktop app is also possible.

What program are you intending to develop?

--
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEYQsotVz8/kXqG1Y7MRa6Xp/6aaMFAmOX+BcACgkQMRa6Xp/6 aaNwVQ//ZrDcRpL4Sri0q5/imhtJWo+gdeJ/r9V39TZ8WFqwQ5BP4/fjwDve5slQ AnqYkqsEiHxGPJRHIPbI+JwHKsiSC/1kzmE3YVgx8LN2ghD6ips1VbDS9fnuneRn 65tAWQf5qxjQPtul9D084P4pWS6lm8llZC3gnhXek3jfmpBOjwZ/EN/MxG/CMSeF CLvG0ZAP0nzfmGpi91DgfjjHHi09bZHaZuZ1tw9Ok/Kppc4/bsAe1DYKwaCZyRYg aOVXM5QIF5axz1UXWzxuYF2PlLMgeAx+ERBBoAeQvjXzhoqrs7mqFOwhLqnw0oka 7sE2RGZhPEN+lztsNkyuEZ7mBcTzgV/KIzh0ZpbAMA4UWvZCliS4ztB+K8ZXM+wF PfZI8LA7j9A4075SH8C5P+yqovXfcK89ouedQO0YqyQTM5MytmEDwmsvetGgHT+z U95HbxgpwfM0SBVhS9ynldBznUHZJzqTvweuE85AQOIABuWk6hAMPKSUgO/ugYDX Kzo9hAOaIZWwk3/mc815PVnfdDX33wJtEmukEUFym2NmpRBt6aEfhyQm0CJCkn0I SB6eunNTfijdYWNXgLgbenb59PXw3xducxml9stH2eEp3yjFFHcqN7yskn1SoFxR EJWs68qfcy1YBUhD9jooF/shc5LKOwZCeQ7uiaN1bB8Y7Qd3cbU=
=ht9O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi,

What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
acceptance) of QT?

As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the
browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet
supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this information!)

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even
my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find
other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.

QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page
web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be
more accessible than a QT app even today.
I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux
desktop accessibility, although both are usable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:51 AM Imre Nagy <nagyimre@nagyimre.com> wrote:

Hi,

What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
acceptance) of QT?

As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the
browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check this information!)

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it. (Even
my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Qt 6 will not be in debian until debin 13. Bookworm will still have Qt 5

and KDE 5. You can manually download and install Qt6 on Debian. If you
target Debian 13 for inclusion of your app that will give you about two
years to finish it.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.
Thanks for your time.

QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single page
web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going to be
more accessible than a QT app even today.
I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with linux desktop accessibility, although both are usable.

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:51 AM Imre Nagy &lt;<a href="mailto:nagyimre@nagyimre.com">nagyimre@nagyimre.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="
gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>

What do we think about &quot;accessibility&quot; in this thread? The MSAA like <br>
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and <br>
acceptance) of QT?<br>

As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard <br> choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since you can <br> generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the <br> browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet <br> suppor

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hi Timothy,

I understand that, but 2 years from now Qt would be around 6.8-6.9 ...
possible Qt7?
So I start to have doubt that Debian could ever catch up.
Although you are right, that _I_ can install Qt6 from sources, but I
cannot expect that from all my users. They just want to use it.

So I am a bit disappointed with this now, although I would like to pay
my respect and send kudos for all Debian people, since they are doing an enormous job.

I.

2022. 12. 13. 14:08 keltezéssel, Timothy M Butterworth írta:

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 12:51 AM Imre Nagy <nagyimre@nagyimre.com> wrote:

Hi,

What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The MSAA like
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity (and
acceptance) of QT?

As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make the hard
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application, since
you can
generate both from the same QT source code. The native is native, the
browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is not yet
supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double check
this
information!)

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream
Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting for it.
(Even
my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still in
unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like me
to find
other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Qt 6 will not be in debian until debin 13. Bookworm will still have Qt
5 and KDE 5. You can manually download and install Qt6 on Debian. If
you target Debian 13 for inclusion of your app that will give you
about two years to finish it.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:
>> I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will
use qt.
>> Thanks for your time.
>
> QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that a single
page
> web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that is going
to be
> more accessible than a QT app even today.
> I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I do with
linux
> desktop accessibility, although both are usable.
>
>

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Timothy,<br>
<br>
I understand that, but 2 years from now Qt would be around 6.8-6.9
... possible Qt7?<br>
So I start to have doubt that Debian could ever catch up.<br>
Although you are right, that _I_ can install Qt6 from sources, but
I cannot expect that from all my users. They just want to use it.<br>
<br>
So I am a bit disappointed with this now, although I would like to
pay my respect and send kudos for all Debian people, since they
are doing an enormous job.<br>
<br>
I.<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">2022. 12. 13. 14:08 keltezéssel,
Timothy M Butterworth írta:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAO6YxPzmECxYZBFA05PJRx10S6=-TqnggaS-a58gsxVDz2cn9w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at
12:51 AM Imre Nagy &lt;<a
href="mailto:nagyimre@nagyimre.com" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">nagyimre@nagyimre.com</a>&gt;
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
What do we think about "accessibility" in this thread? The
MSAA like <br>
helping for visually challenged, or the global avaiblity
(and <br>
acceptance) of QT?<br>
<br>
As of Qt 5.15, (and Qt 6.4.x lately) you do not have to make
the hard <br>
choice between responsive webpage or desktop application,
since you can <br>
generate both from the same QT source code. The native is
native, the <br>
browser based using WebAssembly technology. (I think MSAA is
not yet <br>
supported for WebAssembly till this date, but please double
check this <br>
information!)<br>
<br>
The downside of these things, that current Debian does not
seem to <br>
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into
the mainstream <br>
Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting
for it. (Even <br>
my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is still
in <br>
unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers
like me to find <br>
other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<div>Qt 6 will not be in debian until debin 13. Bookworm will
still have Qt 5 and KDE 5. You can manually download and
install Qt6 on Debian. If you target Debian 13 for inclusion
of your app that will give you about two years to finish it.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
Best regards,<br>
Imre<br>
<br>
2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:<br>
&gt;&gt; I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also
possible. I will use qt.<br>
&gt;&gt; Thanks for your time.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; QT accessibility has improved a lot, but I suspect that
a single page<br>
&gt; web app with vuejs and a good widget set on top of that
is going to be<br>
&gt; more accessible than a QT app even today.<br>
&gt; I find I stumble less with web app accessibility than I
do with linux<br>
&gt; desktop accessibility, although both are usable.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀</span><br
style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The
universal operating system</span><br
style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ </span><a
href="https://www.debian.org/" rel="noreferrer"
style="color:rgb(17,85,204)" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.debian.org/</a><br
style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34)">⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀</span><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.

On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting
for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is
still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers like
me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I call it websearch++. It is basically an app for searching the web like
google or duckduckgo but with additional features. Those features are
for example: You can assign information (useful, less useful, garbage
for example) to web search result links or whole domains (useful for blacklisting). Everything gets persisted. This way you won't forget what
is already checked and what is not checked yet. It's a power user tool
for careful web searches, where you do not want to miss a search result
link.

Do you think it's useful? I would use it.

Do you know any tools like that? I didn't find something like that.

On 13.12.22 04:57, Paul Wise wrote:

On Mon, 2022-12-12 at 18:01 +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

I wan't a highly interactive web app, A desktop app is also possible.

What program are you intending to develop?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Greetings,

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 09:27:34PM +0100, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.

On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting
for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is
still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers
like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Qt6 is very well usable in testing. I recently ported my (heavily graphical) programs to Qt6 from Qt5 and that was pretty straightforward. I thinks there are
reasonable backports to stable, also. That might need some checking, though.

Sincerely,
Filippo

--

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Research scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://msxpertsuite.org
http://www.debian.org


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFMwThfW1Bndm0ZRQatITXaUz0IFAmOY57gACgkQQatITXaU z0KV1Q/9FFyX9TolkDuVVH1zYqau8pTQPUyHev1hoHhTtjvE2L2t+XM8eKx6tiqU T+Vf31VXnD6ERAm7oi7MHz74xhGfjzSBsv+cSna+eHPwog4SrBB6ja6xdq1GcyCH eeUnE+Z0RnaRS9wBqBTA219iliH/EN7OV5cqZQh4W37hGS8jKfFGobgFcCt/aS5B 3YjF7Vr1sxmbcqU3dv2aSMBVj/Zg2vRv13aeoUBSeB0iOZ6UFsfVlyGAkpyLUHys X4IfiOhAuITmg7btttDAAogQq1eyHhx7HiH18Kzagp0gSlm478elGPPYPw7HGMrn 0eVTr8QWjsHnh5d7JlcusB94a0U09wPTOkUx5uOzTQr45TkTVO0X8aFitY6DF2JZ HTqjs8OHq7pnZzs/cFutaKKQBbdH9cBDffhzzIbfeYDcFBWNTBvE4W5kZ3ExZJNC LN7hRQ/Bij1Ytnqk9fVOaV6jO8f2G+IUmxwk3vhCSs6xN9X+boSHrDLessgHtsWU CMsxTiQmR9txX/1fgT8S1aNSzdvADcUNxcEfKBjWk/O6uAouLmfdBIJmk0BZMw3k M+Gfx/svAIWqZ6jKHvuuczmWkjmJo68qTun4rqxxhAVJzM8r0JplR9nJ9NkZ6cRN IcJbGG7NFIHPqn1kMn+uXuo+C49tehAV0

Hi,

Is Qt6-base  not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?

regards

Alastair

On 13/12/2022 20:27, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.

On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting
for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is
still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers
like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.

--
Alastair McKinstry,
GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
ph: +353 87 6847928 e: alastair@sceal.ie, im: @sceal.ie:mckinstry

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:51 AM Alastair McKinstry < alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie> wrote:

Hi,

Is Qt6-base not in testing, for bookworm? I've an app (metview) that I switched over Qt5->Qt6, should I move it back?

Bookworm currently has Qt 6.3.1 and 6.4.0 packaged.

regards

Alastair

On 13/12/2022 20:27, Andreas Josef Heil wrote:

Well qt5 is fine too. I don't need fancy features. I will make a kde app.

On 13.12.22 05:22, Imre Nagy wrote:

The downside of these things, that current Debian does not seem to
include Qt6 at all and I have no idea when it can go into the
mainstream Debian, while there are a lot of project could be waiting
for it. (Even my one is still pending for Debian). Qt6 for Debian is
still in unstable/experimental state, which drives the developers
like me to find other alternatives instead of Debian or for Debian.

Best regards,
Imre

2022. 12. 13. 1:48 keltezéssel, Sam Hartman írta:

I wrote too early sry. A desktop app is also possible. I will use qt.

--
Alastair McKinstry,
GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
ph: +353 87 6847928 e: alastair@sceal.ie, im: @sceal.ie:mckinstry

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 8:51 AM Alastair McKinstry &lt;<a href="mailto:alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie">alastair.mckinstry@sceal.ie</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>

Is Qt6-base  not in testing, for bookworm? I&#39;ve an app (metview) that I <br>
switched over Qt5-&gt;Qt6, should I move it back?<br> <br></blockquote><div><br>Bookworm currently has Qt <span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:monospace">6.3.1 and 6.4.0 packaged.</span></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,
204);padding-left:1ex">
regards<br>

Alastair<br>

On 13/12/2022 2