Hi,
I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source package
from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package provides docker
binary package and transitional docker.io package.
Most of users who is not Debian expert still confusing with docker
package, so I want to fix it in Debian12 "bookworm".
wmdocker and transitional dummy docker package is already in Debian10
"buster", so it does not confuse users and also other packages as
well.
Any thoughts?
If there's no objections against it, I'll file a bug and upload
renamed source package for wmdocker (maybe with some more updates to
comply with current Standards-version) first.
wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker(from docker.io)?
how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker(from docker.io)?
how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker(from docker.io)?
On 05/12/22 18:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
how do you avoid that people who still have got the transitional docker
wmdocker) package installed end up being upgraded to real docker(from docker.io)?
How was the transition from git-the-file-viewer to git-the-VCS handled
in lenny/squeeze?
I'd like to propose wmdocker package would rename its source
package from docker to wmdocker, and then docker.io package
provides docker binary package and transitional docker.io package.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 360 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 128:38:23 |
Calls: | 7,686 |
Files: | 12,828 |
Messages: | 5,711,092 |