Il giorno ven 19 ago 2022 alle 16:11:28 +00:00:00,
debian-devel-digest-request@lists.debian.org ha scritto:
muon-build seems more consistent with its own domain name
muon.build, the
reference meson implementation's domain name mesonbuild.com, and
their
shared dependency ninja being packaged as ninja-build.
Yeah it makes sense. I'll also ask upstream for their opinion, but
muon-build seem to be the most appropriate name.
And if KDE Muon is indeed dead, simply having a "Conflicts: muon" and
using the same path should be ok as well?
I had the same idea, even if it is not extremely elegant. But Paul
doesn't seem to agree; why?
--
OpenPGP key: 66DE F152 8299 0C21 99EF A801 A8A1 28A8 AB1C EE49
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)