According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil
recommends udisks2.

Two questions:
1) Why?
2) What willI I lose by having udevil *without* udisks2?

Many thanks, J

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 10 May 2022 at 13:06, Jaime <enopatch@gmail.com> wrote:

According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil
recommends udisks2.

I've also just realised that udisks2 is not mentioned anywhere in the
upstream build instructions:

https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/udevil/blob/master/README

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --------------2NaYAN5I0krgdgXvQ9tOcdC4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

DQpbc3VjaCBxdWVzdGlvbnMgYXJlIHByb2JhYmx5IGJldHRlciBkaXJlY3RlZCBhdCBkZWJp YW4tdXNlcl0NCg0KQW0gMTAuMDUuMjIgdW0gMTQ6NDYgc2NocmllYiBKYWltZToNCj4gT24g VHVlLCAxMCBNYXkgMjAyMiBhdCAxMzowNiwgSmFpbWUgPGVub3BhdGNoQGdtYWlsLmNvbT4g d3JvdGU6DQo+PiBBY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gaHR0cHM6Ly9wYWNrYWdlcy5kZWJpYW4ub3JnL2J1 bGxzZXllL3VkZXZpbCwgdWRldmlsDQo+PiByZWNvbW1lbmRzIHVkaXNrczIuDQo+IA0KPiBJ J3ZlIGFsc28ganVzdCByZWFsaXNlZCB0aGF0IHVkaXNrczIgaXMgbm90IG1lbnRpb25lZCBh bnl3aGVyZSBpbiB0aGUNCj4gdXBzdHJlYW0gYnVpbGQgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zOg0KPiANCj4g aHR0cHM6Ly9naXRodWIuY29tL0lnbm9yYW50R3VydS91ZGV2aWwvYmxvYi9tYXN0ZXIvUkVB RE1FDQoNCg0KDQokIGdyZXAgVURpc2tzIC1SDQpzcmMvdWRldmlsLmM6ICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBwcmludGYoICJjaGFuZ2VkOiANCi9vcmcvZnJlZWRlc2t0b3AvVURpc2tzL2Rl dmljZXMvJXNcbiIsIGJkZXYgKTsNCnNyYy91ZGV2aWwuYzogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgcHJp bnRmKCAiYWRkZWQ6IA0KL29yZy9mcmVlZGVza3RvcC9VRGlza3MvZGV2aWNlcy8lc1xuIiwg YmRldiApOw0Kc3JjL3VkZXZpbC5jOiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBwcmludGYoICJyZW1vdmVk OiANCi9vcmcvZnJlZWRlc2t0b3AvVURpc2tzL2RldmljZXMvJXNcbiIsIGJkZXYgKTsNCnNy Yy91ZGV2aWwuYzogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgcHJpbnRmKCAiY2hhbmdlZDogDQovb3JnL2Zy ZWVkZXNrdG9wL1VEaXNrcy9kZXZpY2VzLyVzXG4iLCBiZGV2ICk7DQpzcmMvdWRldmlsLmM6 ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHByaW50ZiggIm1vdmVkOiANCi9vcmcvZnJlZWRlc2t0b3AvVURp c2tzL2RldmljZXMvJXNcbiIsIGJkZXYgKTsNCnNyYy9kZXZpY2UtaW5mby5jOiAgICBsaW5l W2krK10gPSBnX3N0cmR1cF9wcmludGYoIlNob3dpbmcgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gDQpmb3IgL29y Zy9mcmVlZGVza3RvcC9VRGlza3MvZGV2aWNlcy8lc1xuIiwgYmRldiApOw0KDQoNCkluIHNo b3J0LCB1ZGV2aWwgdXNlcyB1ZGlza3MgdmlhIGl0cyBELUJ1cyBpbnRlcmZhY2UuDQo=

--------------2NaYAN5I0krgdgXvQ9tOcdC4--

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wsF5BAABCAAjFiEECbOsLssWnJBDRcxUauHfDWCPItwFAmJ6YzwFAwAAAAAACgkQauHfDWCPIty7 uBAAi7TLZq+aXTBai/MCc6H6TDl076b8kM5cXyeKKtMP9RKy8LJ814Zi7+5+xFenuBzP9x64QFFT Pg5RcQpKQHrjYsyojenZEfkgz+9YOBaxs0rUbKPOZtjBBnfuYMKULdWzmkK+3WN3RaEzhcbBeLEE 3CXDDjNoMwHlEzpSMOinIuaff9ZjMJz7LQ5avzADeQz26wjgPBiohEpS3ESJzxXIZmy+NDo4q88z tuFNRwb4iNEEvodiitqj1qmnHoyF/4FoVi3UNHxSM0DJCZjGlgEYldsBNyO0uS980FsvDXJJh1/q Er4WZ6aUWvcHlXdZBupOYAuDodbn1a+9q8Et+C7tn5y2xjvhFdnK0Mt9aPtppOl2RuQYQyc8Ge+2 OVAaz0IeVgxxBDFNx2dz4ECGLFyklkzM1AYmscOoUH38bQCn8uEt4g7OncqH+xtDz7Zrc/ZvPBh2 oK6kL3XiGUfYCx7RquAW6j8gLSXtFbplPuCjJcuihbKjLWShCQfmGibdcBkcHAd2ZcsR4OgIxbr4 FTF1/l/ordZgm7MBLS7w0j53c3mPl6cmPumh8gDZcCDt9mfPjqUU5JDbIOKWBUxFxliYq/+O6iNS Sezy6Niv0f/rT2ELKTnW62oFmudOv8rLQ8tcV+ScjRrL8EQBmUm/WWIZ+FNO2JuKXBNB/+HvFLyp nVg=
=On5z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 10.05.2022 at 14:06 +0200, Jaime wrote:

According to https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/udevil, udevil
recommends udisks2.

Two questions:
1) Why?
2) What willI I lose by having udevil *without* udisks2?

Many thanks, J

Hello,

I think adding the maintainer as CC to this message was perhaps too
difficult.

Anyway:

1. https://igurublog.wordpress.com/downloads/script-devmon/#withtable
Upstream author suggests it to writable mount.

2. Nothing

--
.''`. Mateusz Łukasik
: :' : l0calh0st.pl
`. `' Debian Member - mati75@linuxmint.pl
`- GPG: D93B 0C12 C8D0 4D7A AFBC FA27 CCD9 1D61 11A0 6851

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)