Hi,
I think Salsa CI is a great tool for rebuilding all the reverse build dependencies
of a given package (here nodejs, but it applies to all others). Unfortunately, the current salsa gitlab runners available are not scaled to be
able to handle that use case.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 4:09 AM Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> wrote:
Hi,
I think Salsa CI is a great tool for rebuilding all the reverse builddependencies
of a given package (here nodejs, but it applies to all others). Unfortunately, the current salsa gitlab runners available are not scaledto be
able to handle that use case.
Are the runners, or Salsa, or the GitLab(software) itself not scaled
to handle such cases?
I have the impression that Google Cloud has funded the shared runners,
and the budget is not the problem.
I asked, and got that answer:
"The shared runners are definitely not for such kind of rebuilds." https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/291#note_301386
Jérémy Lal wrote:
I asked, and got that answer:
"The shared runners are definitely not for such kind of rebuilds." https://salsa.debian.org/salsa/support/-/issues/291#note_301386
Perhaps the existing infra for archive-wide rebuilds could be used?
https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/ArchiveTesting
Otherwise combining ratt and debomatic or other hardware might work:
https://packages.debian.org/ratt
https://debomatic.github.io/
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 23:26:31 |
Calls: | 6,707 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,239 |
Messages: | 5,352,101 |