• Bug#1067525: RFS: runit/2.1.2-59 -- system-wide service supervision

    From Lorenzo@21:1/5 to tobi@debian.org on Sat Mar 23 03:30:01 2024
    Package: sponsorship-requests
    Severity: normal

    Dear mentors,

    I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit":

    * Package name : runit
    Version : 2.1.2-59
    Upstream contact : Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
    * URL : http://smarden.org/runit/
    * License : CC0-1.0, BSD-3-clause, GPL-3+
    * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit
    Section : admin

    The source builds the following binary packages:

    runit - system-wide service supervision
    runit-run - service supervision (systemd and sysv integration)
    getty-run - runscripts to supervise getty processes
    runit-init - system-wide service supervision (as init system)

    To access further information about this package, please visit the
    following URL:

    https://mentors.debian.net/package/runit/

    Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
    command:

    dget -x
    https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit/runit_2.1.2-59.dsc

    Git repo:

    https://salsa.debian.org/debian/runit/-/tree/next?ref_type=heads

    Changes since the last upload:

    runit (2.1.2-59) unstable; urgency=medium
    .
    * upload to unstable
    * d/copyright: update years
    * d/watch: use https instead of http
    * lintian: update overrides for runit
    * Revert "d/rules: undo changelog trimming for runit"
    * update-service: add bash-completion
    * cpsv: update manpage


    About the getty-run.NEWS in a previous RFS(#1057098):

    On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:06:46 +0100 Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org> wrote:

    You've misunderstood me with NEWS file (but this is not a stopper for
    the upload.)

    What I meant is that the NEWS file is that old that it should be
    removed. (Debhelper just pointed me to the file, even if it did
    not correctly disagnose the issue)
    This is even more correct if debhelper decided to strip out that
    version from d/changelog anyways, users will not get this NEWS
    files displayed, and the information in it shouldn't be relveant
    anymore.
    So my suggestion would be to just rm it.

    I prefer not to remove this for now, the info inside the file are
    relevant for me (as maintainer) since I would like to remove the
    links in getty-run.links in the future (they are kind of a policy
    violation) but I face the same issue as Dmitry..

    Regards,
    Lorenzo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)