--T+mpoWAmgHybixqE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The previous NMU patch fell afoul of debian/control.in and the debian/rules mapping between soup2 and soup3. Please find attached an improved patch.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

--T+mpoWAmgHybixqE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nmu_wpewebkit.debdiff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -Nru wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog --- wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 16:36:25.000000000 +0000
+++ wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 02:43:03.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+wpewebkit (2.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1063223
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:43:03 +0000
+
wpewebkit (2.42.5-1) unstable; urgency=high

* N

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.


Dear maintainer,

Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.

Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard
against accidental backports with a wrong ABI.

Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-14-generic (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

diff -Nru wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog --- wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 16:36:25.000000000 +0000
+++ wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 09:23:10.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+wpewebkit (2.42.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1063223
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:23:10 +0000
+
wpewebkit (2.42.5-1) unstable; urgency=high

* New upstream release.
diff -Nru wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/control wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/control
--- wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/control 2024-02-05 16:36:25.000000000 +0000
+++ wpewebkit-2.42.5/debian/control 2024-02-29 09:23:10.000000000 +0000
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian WebKit Maintainers <pkg-webkit-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Uploaders: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
-Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
+Build-Depends: dpkg-dev (>= 1.22.5), debhelper-compat (= 13),
bubblewrap [!alpha !ia64 !risc

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:23:38AM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:

Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.

Thanks for the patch!

I have a question: soon I'll need to start transitioning the WPE
packages to a new API (we were blocked by the reverse dependencies)
which means libwpewebkit-1.1-0 -> libwpewebkit-2.0-0

Shall I add the 't64' suffix to the new binaries for clarity or is it unnecessary? In principle they won't have a version without 64-bit
time_t (unless there's a backport which I'm not planning to do).

Berto

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:13:32AM +0000, Alberto Garcia wrote:

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:23:38AM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:

Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.

Thanks for the patch!

I have a question: soon I'll need to start transitioning the WPE
packages to a new API (we were blocked by the reverse dependencies)
which means libwpewebkit-1.1-0 -> libwpewebkit-2.0-0

Shall I add the 't64' suffix to the new binaries for clarity or is it unnecessary? In principle they won't have a version without 64-bit
time_t (unless there's a backport which I'm not planning to do).

Please drop the t64 when bumping the soname, but keep the dpkg-dev
versioned build-dep.

Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErEg/aN5yj0PyIC/KVo0w8yGyEz0FAmXhppsACgkQVo0w8yGy Ez0guBAAptD1+NhiDdF1CAJdYyJke7CY9+wIsX6yqXRO4ioRwxpsjIlaD6pgYubT 1+aGChnS5fqnbd+kVv+koXHi7pEWmnF6rk2wiLARS5XSUclL22hJkfIL8BxM32Qd gUpYe6dmXakozkqGJYLeMCckId9mKpHR0mqZm/fPemdzY86MjQ00wur2UJRYo5Oo qcuB+LWiJ361ygrMQ22oNUVYJri8rOOIZ7gjX9sdFpLA7sErQG1cQ/PBptuIPvNi HDdIuDwc6X14grx4TXRqRNwKRpHREYlPQgH7az6BoEfIHbLcbPGAVCvfs/W595dW ZdOtRl67jRnLAXht/+Z+eYYHoSVPUPuOo2VuHypqB1Yyk4YtPaEwJDqFvaVOaoLl 0k4VZN4g1A2XKASWSKuxriMtTBuYrW4tmwFJkN+qOkX10dKZ7PQzse1JsXaGV7ug Fl5nieL1saExfS8yRUpNYbTgJgjU2I6/oFrov0+hAA00qhUqMCbBxBxS2BWf5o8k mrGKHfjGk0gjv67c0IT6OMWbMu2lAI/Ld6kGyB6Izip2yJDnmQ2Hv/IWOxMqFEjM HJTcief90zqnmpxZ8IjM