• Bug#1064726: Should I upload 0ad involved in wxwidgets3.2 migration?

    From Sebastian Ramacher@21:1/5 to Ludovic Rousseau on Wed Mar 27 16:10:02 2024
    On 2024-03-27 15:51:22 +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
    Hello Debian Release team,

    0ad has a FTBFS bug #1064726.
    I have a new version with the fix ready for upload.

    But when trying to upload I get:
    ---------------------
    $ dupload --to debian-ssh *_source.changes --no
    dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
    Checking OpenPGP signatures before upload......signatures are ok
    Checking Debian transitions...

    Warning: Source package 0ad is part of ongoing transitions:

    <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-curl>
    <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpng1.6>
    <https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wxwidgets3.2>

    If the upload does not solve issues caused by these transitions, then it might disrupt them by adding delays or entangling them. For more information, please read:

    <https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/TransitionUploadHook>

    Note: If you are aware of this and do not want to be warned, you can disable this hook from the configuration file, skip it with --skip-hooks or set the one-off environment variable DUPLOAD_SKIP_HOOKS, or alternatively you can reply to the following prompt.

    Continue anyway? (yes/NO)
    ---------------------

    I see 0ad listed in https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wxwidgets3.2.html
    Of course the rebuild failed because the FTBFS fix is not yet in unstable.

    Should I upload a new version of 0ad to help the wxwidgets3.2 migration?

    Yes, please. The upload is necessary to rebuild 0ad for these
    transitions.

    Cheers

    Should I wait for 0ad to be removed from testing (planned in 5 days)?

    Please Cc: me on reply.

    Thanks

    --
    Dr. Ludovic Rousseau


    --
    Sebastian Ramacher

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)