Package: libpmix2t64
Version: 5.0.2-1
Severity: grave

After installing the package there is no /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/libpmix.so.2.

Looking at the contents of .deb, there are:

./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pmix2/lib/libpmix.so.2.13.2 ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpmix.so.2 -> pmix2/lib/libpmix.so.2.13.1 ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpmix.so.2.13.1 -> pmix2/lib/libpmix.so.2.13.1 ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pmix2/lib/libpmix.so.2 -> libpmix.so.2.13.2

So the symlinks in the public path are broken, and after installing the package they don't even exist at all (I assume ldconfig removes them?).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.7.9-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libpmix2t64 depends on:
ii libc6 2.37-15.1
ii libevent-core-2.1-7t64 2.1.12-stable-8.1+b1
ii libevent-pthreads-2.1-7t64 2.1.12-stable-8.1+b1
ii libhwloc-plugins 2.10.0-1+b1
ii libhwloc15 2.10.0-1+b1
ii libmunge2 0.5.15-4
ii zlib1g 1:1.3.dfsg-3.1

libpmix2t64 recommends no packages.

libpmix2t64 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 19:50:21 +0000
with message-id <E1rpCoP-002Oy8-0J@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1067784: fixed in pmix 5.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067784,
regarding Doesn't contain libpmix.so.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1067784: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2024 18:57:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FOURLA,
FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,XMAILER_REPORTBUG
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 150; neutral, 87; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--sk:taint_o,
0.000-+--sk:TAINT_O, 0.000-+--sk:taint_u, 0.000-+--sk:TAINT_U Return-path: <wrar@debian.org>
Received: from wrar.name ([116.203.248.210]:49510 helo=durkon.wrar.name)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AE

Processing control commands:

tags 1067784 + patch

Bug #1067784 [libpmix2t64] Doesn't contain libpmix.so.2
Added tag(s) patch.

tags 1067784 + pending

Bug #1067784 [libpmix2t64] Doesn't contain libpmix.so.2
Added tag(s) pending.

--
1067784: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Tue, 09 Apr 2024 09:35:17 +0000
with message-id <E1ru7sr-00Gt5P-CB@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1067784: fixed in openmpi 4.1.6-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067784,
regarding Doesn't contain libpmix.so.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1067784: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2024 18:57:52 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FOURLA,
FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,XMAILER_REPORTBUG
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 15; hammy, 150; neutral, 87; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--sk:taint_o,
0.000-+--sk:TAINT_O, 0.000-+--sk:taint_u, 0.000-+--sk:TAINT_U Return-path: <wrar@debian.org>
Received: from wrar.name ([116.203.248.210]:49510 helo=durkon.wrar.name)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AE