• Bug#1067756: dcraw ftbfs

    From Matthias Klose@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 26 12:40:01 2024
    Package: src:dcraw
    Version: 9.28-4
    Severity: serious
    Tags: sid trixie ftbfs

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=dcraw&arch=amd64&ver=9.28-4&stamp=1711307393&raw=0

    gcc -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"dcraw\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"dcraw\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"9.28\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"dcraw\ 9.28\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"hroch@physics.muni.cz\" -DPACKAGE_URL=\"\" -DPACKAGE=\"dcraw\" -DVERSION=\"9.28\" -DHAVE_LIBM=1 -DHAVE_STDIO_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1
    -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1
    -DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1
    -DHAVE_JPEGLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBJPEG=1 -DHAVE_LCMS2_H=1 -DHAVE_LIBLCMS2=1
    -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
    -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security
    -fcf-protection -O4 -c -o clean_crw.o clean_crw.c
    fujiturn.c: In function ‘main’:
    fujiturn.c:61:3: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    61 | fread (in, iwide, sizeof *in, ifp);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fujiturn.c:78:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    78 | fread (in, iwide, sizeof *in, ifp);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fujiturn.c: In function ‘main’:
    fujiturn.c:76:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ntohs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    76 | mid[orow*owide+ocol][i] = ntohs(in[icol][i]);
    | ^~~~~
    fujiturn.c:90:28: error: implicit declaration of function ‘htons’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    90 | out[ocol][i] = htons (
    | ^~~~~
    fujiturn.c:61:3: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    61 | fread (in, iwide, sizeof *in, ifp);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fujiturn.c:78:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    78 | fread (in, iwide, sizeof *in, ifp);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    clean_crw.c: In function ‘main’:
    clean_crw.c:54:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘fread’ declared
    with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    54 | fread (buffer, 1, size, fp);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    fuji_green.c: In function ‘read_shorts’:
    fuji_green.c:72:29: error: implicit declaration of function ‘ntohs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    72 | if ((order == 0x4949) == (ntohs(0x1234) == 0x1234))
    | ^~~~~
    fuji_green.c:73:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘swab’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    73 | swab (pixel, pixel, count*2);
    | ^~~~
    fuji_green.c: In function ‘write_psd’:
    fuji_green.c:249:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘htonl’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    249 | hw[0] = htonl(height*2); /* write the header */
    | ^~~~~
    fuji_green.c: In function ‘main’:
    fuji_green.c:307:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isatty’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    307 | if (isatty(1)) {
    | ^~~~~~

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 26 22:10:01 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 26 Mar 2024 21:04:59 +0000
    with message-id <E1rpDyd-002qjE-CG@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1066465: fixed in dcraw 9.28-5
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1066465,
    regarding dcraw ftbfs
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1066465: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066465
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2024 11:34:34 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
    RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,
    SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 150; neutral, 110; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
    0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--sk:buildd.,
    0.000-+--UD:buildd.debian.org
    Return-path: <doko@debian.org>
    Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:55079 helo=einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (