Hi,
Andrey Rakhmatullin <
wrar@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:50:26 +0500):
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 11:29:11AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
I cannot reproduce this. I downloaded debian-policy source package and built
it in an up-to-date sid chroot. And the built package has this:
$ dpkg-deb -c debian-policy_4.6.2.1_all.deb | grep theme.css
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2024-02-24 15:39 ./usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/_static/css/theme.css -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/css/theme.css
But above output shows a filesize of 0B.
Shouldn't that be something different?
Not for symlinks.
Ok.
Has ./usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/_static/css/theme.css any useful content, when you open it?
It's a symlink, it can't have content.
It's target does have content, as shown in the quote below:
So, it is a symlink, not an empty file. When resolving the relative path, I get /usr/share/sphinx_rtd_theme/static/css/theme.css, and that file exists in sphinx-rtd-theme-common and is non-empty.
if you open that theme.css file in the debian/debian-policy build path, does it have any content?
:-/
Maybe it was bad wording, when I wrote
"replaces files provided by read-the-doc theme by empty symlinks" in the subject of this bug.
Probably "symlinks pointing to a not-existing file" is more correct?
To which non-existent files? Are they non-existent only when you don't
have sphinx-rtd-theme-common installed?
Sure.
I don't know where's the problem in detail, I only see that in the debian-policy binary package that file is empty, and therefore the html layout is broken.
It's not empty, it's a symlink that points to a non-existent (on your
system) file.
BTW: the same counts for all the symlinks under _static/fonts/:
holgerw@t520:~/debian-policy$ ls -la policy/debian/debian-policy/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/policy.html/_static/fonts/
total 64
drwxr-xr-x 2 holgerw holgerw 4096 Mar 22 11:17 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 holgerw holgerw 4096 Mar 22 11:17 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 68 Mar 22 11:17 fontawesome-webfont.eot -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.eot
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 68 Mar 22 11:17 fontawesome-webfont.svg -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.svg
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 68 Mar 22 11:17 fontawesome-webfont.ttf -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 69 Mar 22 11:17 fontawesome-webfont.woff -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 70 Mar 22 11:17 fontawesome-webfont.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/fontawesome-webfont.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 64 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-BoldItalic.ttf -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-BoldItalic.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 66 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-BoldItalic.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-BoldItalic.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 58 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Bold.ttf -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Bold.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 60 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Bold.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Bold.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 60 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Italic.ttf -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Italic.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 62 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Italic.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Italic.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 61 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Regular.ttf -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Regular.ttf
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 63 Mar 22 11:17 Lato-Regular.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/Lato-Regular.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 66 Mar 22 11:17 RobotoSlab-Bold.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/RobotoSlab-Bold.woff2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 holgerw holgerw 69 Mar 22 11:17 RobotoSlab-Regular.woff2 -> ../../../../../sphinx_rtd_theme/static/fonts/RobotoSlab-Regular.woff2
All those symlinks are pointing to a not-existing target here.
Only because you don't have sphinx-rtd-theme-common installed.
That is indeed installed in the latest version here (sid):
root@t520:/# dpkg -s sphinx-rtd-theme-common
Package: sphinx-rtd-theme-common
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: python
Installed-Size: 1173
Maintainer: Debian Python Team <
team+python@tracker.debian.org>
Architecture: all
Multi-Arch: foreign
Source: sphinx-rtd-theme
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-1
Depends: fonts-font-awesome, fonts-lato
Description: sphinx theme from readthedocs.org (common files)
This mobile-friendly sphinx theme was initially created for readthedocs.org,
but can be incorporated in any project.
.
Among other things, it features a left panel with a browseable table of
contents, and a search bar.
.
This package contains the common files used by the theme.
Homepage:
https://github.com/readthedocs/sphinx_rtd_theme
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, the symlink points to some path inside the package build path, here: /srv/debian-policy/debian-policy-4.6.2.1/debian/debian-policy/usr/share/sphinx_rtd_theme_static/css/theme.css
and that path does not exist.
Same in the debian-policy binary package.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <
hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)