1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.BUGS.RC

  • Bug#1067094: pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh

    From Luca Boccassi@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 18 13:10:01 2024
    Source: pacman-package-manager
    Version: 6.0.2-4.1
    Severity: grave

    Pacman currently fails to build on armel/armhf, probably as a fallout
    from the time64 changes.

    Given it seems extremely unlikely to be needed on those architectures,
    given Archlinux doesn't even support them, I'd recommend to simply
    build-depend on architecture-is-64-bit to drop all 32 bit arches
    support, and revert the libalpm13 package rename that added the t64
    suffix.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ben Westover@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 20 13:30:01 2024
    Hello,

    Arch Linux ARM supports armhf/armel just fine, so I think this can work
    with little to no patches. I haven't been able to take a look since the
    t64 transition because I have been busy with other things. I will likely
    have time tomorrow to fix this.

    --
    Ben Westover

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 21 01:10:02 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:02:41 +0000
    with message-id <E1rn5tJ-0096dy-NJ@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1067094: fixed in pacman-package-manager 6.0.2-5
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1067094,
    regarding pacman-package-manager: FTBFS on armel/armh
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1067094: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067094
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2024 11:57:29 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROMDEVELOPER,
    HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 97; neutral, 25; spammy, 0.
    spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--armhf, 0.000-+--t64,
    0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:luca.bo, 0.000-+--H*RU:sk:luca.bo,
    0.000-+--H*rp:U*luca.boccassi
    Return-path: <luca.boccassi@gmail.com>
    Received: from mail-yw1-f177.google.com ([209.85.128.177]:49628)
    by buxtehude.debian.o