• Bug#1067066: ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declarat

    From Sebastian Ramacher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 17 23:40:01 2024
    Source: ruby-fusefs
    Version: 0.7.0-5
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs
    Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ruby-fusefs&arch=amd64&ver=0.7.0-5%2Bb3&stamp=1710696156&raw=0

    make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ext'
    gcc -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -I. -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby-3.1.0 -I/usr/include/ruby-3.1.0/ruby/backward -I/usr/include/ruby-3.1.0 -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-
    prefix-map=BUILDDIR=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -fPIC -o fusefs_fuse.o -c fusefs_fuse.c
    fusefs_fuse.c: In function ‘fusefs_fd’:
    fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    31 | return fuse_chan_fd(fusech);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
    fusefs_fuse.c: In function ‘fusefs_unmount’:
    fusefs_fuse.c:41:5: warning: ignoring return value of ‘system’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    41 | system(buf);
    | ^~~~~~~~~~~
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
    make[1]: *** [Makefile:246: fusefs_fuse.o] Error 1
    make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ext'

    Cheers
    --
    Sebastian Ramacher

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 12 00:50:01 2024
    Processing control commands:

    tags -1 patch
    Bug #1067066 [src:ruby-fusefs] ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    Added tag(s) patch.

    --
    1067066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067066
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 13 23:40:01 2024
    Processing control commands:

    tag -1 pending
    Bug #1067066 [src:ruby-fusefs] ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    Added tag(s) pending.

    --
    1067066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067066
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Boutillier@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 13 23:40:01 2024
    Control: tag -1 pending

    Hello,

    Bug #1067066 in ruby-fusefs reported by you has been fixed in the
    Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
    message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

    https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-fusefs/-/commit/9e38b361d1949b09ba40e6dbcbe0d777db86f2f8

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Add patch to add missing includes. Thanks Zixing Liu (Closes: #1067066) ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (this message was generated automatically)
    --
    Greetings

    https://bugs.debian.org/1067066

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 14 00:10:01 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sat, 13 Apr 2024 22:03:29 +0000
    with message-id <E1rvlT7-005vZi-RV@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1067066: fixed in ruby-fusefs 0.7.0-6
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1067066,
    regarding ruby-fusefs: fusefs_fuse.c:31:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fuse_chan_fd’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1067066: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067066
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2024 22:36:00 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 19; hammy, 150; neutral, 50; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
    Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
    Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b