Package: src:ruby-magic
Version: 0.2.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie

the package build-depends on libmagic1, and depends on it. The name was recently changed to libmagic1t64. Please don't hard-code it, but try to
b-d on libmagic-dev, and derive the name of the shared library package
from the libmagic-dev package.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1066854 in ruby-magic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-magic/-/commit/3a95d42fa6ea9355487927f2c663a73bbad603ea

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use libmagic-dev in Build-Depends/Depends instead of libmagic1

Closes: #1066854 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

(this message was generated automatically)
--
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1066854

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Processing control commands:

tag -1 pending

Bug #1066854 [src:ruby-magic] don't hard-code the name of the shared library Added tag(s) pending.

--
1066854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:21:24 +0000
with message-id <E1rvEyC-00FNtV-F9@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1066854: fixed in ruby-magic 0.2.9-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1066854,
regarding don't hard-code the name of the shared library
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1066854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2024 12:36:49 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,
SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 18; hammy, 92; neutral, 30; spammy, 0.
spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--trixie,
0.000-+--H*RU:sk:einhorn, 0.000-+--H*r:sk:einhorn,
0.000-+--H*r:doko@debian.org
Return-path: <doko@debian.org>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:34913 helo=einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de)
by buxtehude.deb