• Bug#1066078: vigor FTBFS due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

    From Helmut Grohne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 12 07:10:01 2024
    Source: vigor
    Version: 0.016-31
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs

    Due to time64 and thus enabling -Werror=implicit-function-declaration,
    vigor now fails to build from source:

    | ../../build/../cl/cl_screen.c: In function ‘cl_screen’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_screen.c:112:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tputs’; did you mean ‘puts’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 112 | tputs(tgoto(clp->cup,
    | | ^~~~~
    | | puts
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_screen.c:112:31: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tgoto’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 112 | tputs(tgoto(clp->cup,
    | | ^~~~~
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c: In function ‘cl_attr’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c:125:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tputs’; did you mean ‘puts’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 125 | (void)tputs(clp->smcup, 1, cl_putchar);
    | | ^~~~~
    | | puts
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_read.c: In function ‘block_for_read’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_read.c:137:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mega_select’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 137 | mega_select(fd+1, &fds, NULL, NULL, NULL);
    | | ^~~~~~~~~~~
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c: In function ‘cl_ex_adjust’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c:350:37: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tgoto’; did you mean ‘v_lgoto’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 350 | (void)tputs(tgoto(clp->cup,
    | | ^~~~~
    | | v_lgoto
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c: In function ‘cl_bell’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_funcs.c:214:23: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
    | 214 | (void)write(STDOUT_FILENO, "\07", 1); /* \a */
    | | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_bsd.c: In function ‘setupterm’:
    | ../../build/../cl/cl_bsd.c:176:22: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tgetent’; did you mean ‘getenv’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    | 176 | if ((*errp = tgetent(buf, ttype)) > 0) {
    | | ^~~~~~~
    | | getenv

    Helmut

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Watson@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 12 11:50:01 2024
    Control: tag -1 pending

    Hello,

    Bug #1066078 in vigor reported by you has been fixed in the
    Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
    message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

    https://salsa.debian.org/debian/vigor/-/commit/9d0673487379c41c7b99d50d3e105aa01b9ac33e

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Add many missing #includes

    Closes: #1066078 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (this message was generated automatically)
    --
    Greetings

    https://bugs.debian.org/1066078

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 12 11:50:01 2024
    Processing control commands:

    tag -1 pending
    Bug #1066078 [src:vigor] vigor FTBFS due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
    Added tag(s) pending.

    --
    1066078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066078
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 12 12:10:02 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:08:07 +0000
    with message-id <E1rjzzL-001S6c-Ij@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1066078: fixed in vigor 0.016-32
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1066078,
    regarding vigor FTBFS due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1066078: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066078
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2024 06:04:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,SPF_HELO_NONE,
    SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 40; hammy, 109; neutral, 21; spammy,
    2. spammytokens:0.997-1--vigor, 0.927-+--cup
    hammytokens:0.000-+--H*F:U*helmut, 0.000-+--H*F:D*subdivi.de,
    0.000-+--H*RU:sk:helmut@, 0.000-+--H*rp:U*helmut,
    0.000-+--H*rp:D*subdivi.de
    Return-path: <helmut@subdivi.de>
    Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:48768)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
    (Exim 4.94.2)
    (envelope-fro