• Bug#1065795: inn: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: parsedate.y:43:25: error: implic

    From Sebastian Ramacher@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 9 23:00:01 2024
    Source: inn
    Version: 1:1.7.2q-49
    Severity: serious
    Tags: ftbfs
    Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

    https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=inn&arch=armhf&ver=1%3A1.7.2q-49%2Bb2&stamp=1709806646&raw=0

    cc -I../include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -
    Werror=format-security -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBIAN -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl/5.38/CORE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -c -o parsedate.o parsedate.c
    y.tab.c: In function ‘date_parse’:
    parsedate.y:43:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘date_lex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    43 | #define yylex date_lex
    | ^~~~~~~~
    y.tab.c:1188:16: note: in expansion of macro ‘yylex’
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
    make[2]: *** [<builtin>: parsedate.o] Error 1

    Cheers
    --
    Sebastian Ramacher

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 10 02:40:01 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 01:36:55 +0000
    with message-id <E1rj87T-007wNV-Qc@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1065795: fixed in inn 1:1.7.2q-50
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1065795,
    regarding inn: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: parsedate.y:43:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘date_lex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1065795: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065795
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2024 21:46:40 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
    FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
    UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
    autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 27; hammy, 150; neutral, 49; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
    Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
    Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([