Source: libauthen-krb5-perl
Version: 1.9-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libauthen-krb5-perl&arch=armhf&ver=1.9-6%2Bb3&stamp=1709893977&raw=0

Krb5.xs:1040:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_free_address’; did you mean ‘krb5_free_addresses’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1040 | krb5_free_address(context,addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| krb5_free_addresses

Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi gregor

On 2024-03-14 17:36:11 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:

On Sat, 09 Mar 2024 21:29:26 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

Source: libauthen-krb5-perl
Version: 1.9-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libauthen-krb5-perl&arch=armhf&ver=1.9-6%2Bb3&stamp=1709893977&raw=0

Krb5.xs:1040:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_free_address’; did you mean ‘krb5_free_addresses’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1040 | krb5_free_address(context,addr);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| krb5_free_addresses

Not sure there are many chances to fix this (short of disabling -Werror=implicit-function-declaration). Cf. also in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Authen-Krb5/commits/rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836

So should it be removed?

Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:08:43 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

Not sure there are many chances to fix this (short of disabling -Werror=implicit-function-declaration). Cf. also in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Authen-Krb5/commits/rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2172836

So should it be removed?

I'm by far not any expert on C code and gcc flags; but yes, given the
above findings and unless someone more knowledgeable steps up in the
next couple of week, I think we have to remove libauthen-krb5-perl
(and libauthen-krb5-admin-perl).

Cheers,
gregor

--
.''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
: :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
`. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE0eExbpOnYKgQTYX6uzpoAYZJqgYFAmYKDmVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEQx RTEzMTZFOTNBNzYwQTgxMDREODVGQUJCM0E2ODAxODY0OUFBMDYACgkQuzpoAYZJ qgbCrBAAq27v1ty6N+dljy0pNZgjX9kET4nYDRSVzwm9wXlRol+NAqJQF0wGTpaF VGjaNouVVOr3Z0hp6Btus0McjkTDjnpCZWxjo5A7MxO/ABY01+J+0r6G4nAW/XLZ Q64jwFOkspA3uzRuouuLGTXrjUGRGKQjZzS5klQNgmO0E8JB+EbJrGcTy+ilQley PH0r3ual8gauYIx2uO38tme6jsBycobtsx5K41RB+GU3zz5jx256y8sQfaS6bw5H rQr6eg0dAFI8y9GC9Asf+aomuw71+iJp1A4g1BnJCXKEkr3JWTYrCpPOQes3xvPm fCTtnGCa8UW8VqNZNtv9zC+LV4piX0FjTTvL49dReq83F8jKdWuKlTN5meS+aQhS ZXgZ6TqJiiCOIjEwVw2MfFOjgMuGTA1yAR1nZVrc9e9svVtI57lxrIb5V9KvhWSU 0CTM2MxomUIaGH99MEIKAJGjaRoIJbuPJ8gYfHknuXgF8QEOWmmxT7pRTnGs9JTL UkQ2LeWNJPswm63CBrM4fbOpKLr2EYOEQCorgNNhpdp+ECc8m+kMcLRn3gfDeBrJ igqdzJeMEjfQBRPzJTaArVgU8/r7xHVaST9VnMj1jS5G6SSk8A615PBpL6cR/c7C K4LCRgv6joYP3avNNiSJSy5PIopKvPCse+YUe9P9p9BQ9e5V6c4=
=DuZY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:26:47 +0000
with message-id <E1ruamd-005z7P-9c@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1068258: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065768,
regarding libauthen-krb5-perl: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: Krb5.xs:1040:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_free_address’; did you mean ‘krb5_free_addresses’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1065768: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2024 20:29:29 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,
USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 16; hammy, 126; neutral, 20; spammy,
0. spammytokens:
hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8