Source: libexplain
Version: 1.4.D001-12.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: sramacher@debian.org

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libexplain&arch=armel&ver=1.4.D001-12.1&stamp=1709133439&raw=0

libtool: compile: gcc -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -Wall -Wextra -Wl,--as-needed -I. -c libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.c -fPIC -DPIC -o libexplain/buffer/.libs/ipc_perm.o
libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.c: In function ‘explain_buffer_ipc_perm’: libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.c:104:38: error: ‘const struct ipc_perm’ has no member named ‘key’; did you mean ‘__key’?
104 | explain_buffer_int(sb, data->key);
| ^~~
| __key libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.c:128:41: error: ‘const struct ipc_perm’ has no member named ‘seq’; did you mean ‘__seq’?
128 | explain_buffer_ushort(sb, data->seq);
| ^~~
| __seq
make[1]: *** [Makefile:11444: libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.lo] Error 1

Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:06:44 +0000
with message-id <E1rn0Kq-007wzv-O9@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1065769: fixed in libexplain 1.4.D001-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065769,
regarding libexplain: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: libexplain/buffer/ipc_perm.c:104:38: error: ‘const struct ipc_perm’ has no member named ‘key’; did you mean ‘__key’?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1065769: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Mar 2024 20:30:45 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 22; hammy, 150; neutral, 54; spammy,
0. spammytokens:
hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
Return-path: <sramacher@debian.org>
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([