On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 10:42:16AM +0100, Dylan Aïssi wrote:

Hello,

Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 02:54, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> a écrit :

If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information
becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition,
there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.

I am wondering what is the plan with this package/bug? I noticed that changes related to the 64-bit time_t transition were not uploaded to unstable and because I uploaded several versions in unstable after your NMU in exp, I wonder if I haven't interfered with this transition.

Sorry, yes, the uploads with renaming of both dev package and runtime lib package in the midst of the transition resulted in this package being lost.

Since this is a completely new soname, and only packages built from weston source depend on it, I suggest that you simply request a binNMU of weston on armhf and armel and consider this resolved.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErEg/aN5yj0PyIC/KVo0w8yGyEz0FAmXovrsACgkQVo0w8yGy Ez0yKhAAgSDamuLXyx5Fxaf9gE68xrK5ZgD74bLuHP42zXjBYOQGs6BesYH3DzNF DMMjw5eLgsbr1a514EpYadOr+5fqBuaZntbsr7NzL2yB1AAo/RKZJfbUHWE4q238 yM9SoD5MLOtQTsTJYAOVrA1KUZMdQNVuj9oueY1V6MNaPp0EB7FVJD42p4daYLrc kIjZGF/UuPas7EJc9JkZJiJyUtDmD+5RHbyk4FA8LhJzvEK+ZCBRYjVZ0Gd2PVKn KxDAaiah7O/0PFqzqZXoKugM5c/3oTvfenKj0hs6me2GAWmvAvv5SUj9d3ia2THh EYNNIZganeGZ0mmITZYQseLanpJ+G51LAc1LpCOW46tkFoZteakDKx5l+KIBnMht 6dqm8oat25w/p+E65QbnCOXm7TQeD3vNYcO3ue+LcmrLA2NlFXHHnNF96qZtExLv kgkmEs683N4N0JxrMQErXkPI+fRp2BAoY4er4Nv0hxKjfu5nZDfH98iATj29/qO1 LJ4/tqr9zD/5aTStex2geWss6RonJk01L3PZfNRpMbPgaYWccVfh6GjZj+pUJnWc UQt4jYI09Gsq038Q2Rgv