Source: udns
Version: 0.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
User: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time64

Dear Maintainer,

udns fails to build on both armhf and armel with the time64 build flags, which are on by default. It builds fine without.

Specifically, the following flags cause a failure:

-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64

While the package builds with these:

-U_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -U_FILE_OFFSET_BITS -U_TIME_BITS

Relvant part of the build logs:

checking whenever the C compiler (gcc -Wall -W -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-
clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro)
can produce executables... yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for getopt()... yes
checking for libraries needed for socket and connect... not found
configure: fatal: cannot find libraries needed for sockets
make: *** [debian/rules:15: config.h] Error 1

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Hi Michael,

On 2024-03-01 09:13, Michael Tokarev wrote:

This has nothing to do with time64.

Yes and no. :-)

The prob here is -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Where that flag is coming from?

https://git.dpkg.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/commit/?id=ef90821fe45b99fa8c8c4279b9a74c30f59f491d

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2024 16:21:47 +0000
with message-id <E1rizSF-006NsE-ON@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1065173: fixed in udns 0.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065173,
regarding udns: FTBFS on armhf/armel: configure: fatal: cannot find libraries needed for sockets
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1065173: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065173
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2024 14:20:19 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,
FROMDEVELOPER,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 150; neutral, 53; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--armhf, 0.000-+--wdatetime,
0.000-+--Wdatetime
Return-path: <emarocca@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::633]:39358)
by buxtehude.debian.org with es