On 29-02-2024 4:47 a.m., Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
@d-d:
- How can it happen that purge *t64 packages and at the same time install
the previous package, and then the so file is missing?
I mean it's clear that they use the same name, but shouldn't DPKG handle
the cleanly?
Well, officially downgrading isn't supported (although it typically works) *and* losing files is one of the problems of our merged-/usr solution (see [1]). I *suspect* this might be the cause. We're working hard (well, helmut is) to protect us and our users from loosing files on upgrades. We don't protect against downgrades.
Obviously there might be issues, but you are running unstable *during* a transition. You have to expect some troubles. Thanks for the information, let's see if this is a real issue or not.
retitle -1 libglib2.0-0t64: transition from libglib2.0-0 breaks GSettings, GIO modulesBug #1065022 [libglib2.0-0t64] libglib2.0-0t64: t64 transition breaks the system
Furthermore, this is a downgrade from a replacing package to a
replaced
package. Unless you also --reinstall the package at the end, missing
files
are quite to be expected.
Jeremy uploaded glib 2.0 to experimental which fixes such problems
Well, officially downgrading isn't supported (although it typically
works) *and* losing files is one of the problems of our merged-/usr
solution (see [1]). I *suspect* this might be the cause. We're
working
hard (well, helmut is) to protect us and our users from loosing files
on
upgrades. We don't protect against downgrades.
Obviously there might be issues, but you are running unstable
*during* a
transition. You have to expect some troubles. Thanks for the
information, let's see if this is a real issue or not.
tag -1 pendingBug #1065022 [libglib2.0-0t64] libglib2.0-0t64: transition from libglib2.0-0 breaks GSettings, GIO modules
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 08:10:01 |
Calls: | 6,666 |
Files: | 12,213 |
Messages: | 5,336,192 |