Package: libnetplan1
Version: 0.107.1-3+exp1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fileconflict
Control: affects -1 + libnetplan0
X-Debbugs-Cc: Lukas Märdian <slyon@debian.org>, vorlon@debian.org

libnetplan1 has an undeclared file conflict. This may result in an
unpack error from dpkg.

The file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetplan.so.0.0 is contained in the packages
* libnetplan0
* 0.101-4 as present in bullseye
* 0.106-2+deb12u1 as present in bookworm
* 0.107.1-3 as present in trixie|unstable
* libnetplan1/0.107.1-3+exp1 as present in experimental

These packages can be unpacked concurrently, because there is no
relevant Replaces or Conflicts relation. Attempting to unpack these
packages concurrently results in an unpack error from dpkg, because none
of the packages installs a diversion for the affected file.

Kind regards

The Debian Usr Merge Analysis Tool

This bug report has been automatically filed with no human intervention.
The source code is available at https://salsa.debian.org/helmutg/dumat.
If the filing is unclear or in error, don't hesitate to contact helmut@subdivi.de for assistance.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Processing control commands:

affects -1 + libnetplan0

Bug #1063924 [libnetplan1] libnetplan1 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetplan.so.0.0
Added indication that 1063924 affects libnetplan0

--
1063924: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063924
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:49:52 +0100
with message-id <584a15f3-b12f-4be7-a69f-a8b162ada22f@debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1063924: libnetplan1 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetplan.so.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063924,
regarding libnetplan1 has an undeclared file conflict on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnetplan.so.0.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1063924: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063924
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2024 21:32:21 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,HAS_PACKAGE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 150; neutral, 50; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--bookworm, 0.000-+--X-Debbugs-Cc,
0.000-+--XDebbugsCc, 0.000-+--trixie, 0.000-+--exp1
Return-path: <helmut@subdivi.de>
Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:57134)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <helmut@subdivi.de>)
id 1raMrd