Source: xmorph
Version: 1:20150712-4
Severity: serious
User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

Ciao Andrea,

Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies xmorph as an affected package, on the basis that the headers could not be compiled and analyzed out of the box using abi-compliance-checker[2], so we have to assume it's affected.

However, libmorph's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library package
name that contains no ABI information:

$ cat DEBIAN/shlibs
libmorph 1 libmorph (>= 1:20150712)
$

It is not obvious that we should rename the package to 'libmorpht64' as part
of this transition.

Looking at the archive, there is a package that depends on this library, xmorph. Despite being built from the same source package, it does not have
a strict versioned dependency on libmorph but instead uses the shlibs.

Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name
here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs.
Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to trixie on 32-bit architectures (upgrading libmorph without also upgrading xmorph) will result in ABI skew and may result in broken behavior.

Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html
[2] https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2024-02-03T09%3A18%3A00/logs/libmorph-dev/base/log.txt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErEg/aN5yj0PyIC/KVo0w8yGyEz0FAmXBvFQACgkQVo0w8yGy Ez2vDA/9FShwXytSjmOBG0TeMjEl2UzOWB2/qMJIQxSlWoAtvQo/eAjAS8L2zhYA qxlsT0O9qQgyNzJ53o8l5+XOzaViF7V2JLOaQud9Tb54mMYNE4NdUVQW4AeFZtFD nox701Ckes9+FpIkiCcbT0aDzdJ58h+T8dFYqBGXsZa7teGnKFwtGph/SpWhHIdI dNLUFm8iPdiELjcOrLanh3Ihz9NBKGqgsUwvVhAMsyCgNOOHj2x+YpVM2085k/dY G0z5drjnYsVVuRp+USXmp8mT94T14GhQMK0zIimLkEjC6CM83/gzc/+jdrE/rPNd dmHzgWxlRHRJjyTN1slRhtApFLc8F1WRI4hovL5N7TtjT0lBM6swflZM+Sxsd28

Control: tag -1 pending

Hello,

Bug #1063316 in xmorph reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

https://salsa.debian.org/debian-phototools-team/xmorph/-/commit/f7dfca3f49f85a978900b9a4438cbdc316a6eefc

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tighten xmorph/libmorph dependency.

libmorph has no other reverse dependencies but is involved in the t64 transition. Closes: #1063316 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

(this message was generated automatically)
--
Greetings

https://bugs.debian.org/1063316

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Processing control commands:

tag -1 pending

Bug #1063316 [src:xmorph] xmorph: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
Added tag(s) pending.

--
1063316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:46:17 +0000
with message-id <E1rjJVJ-009lqD-KN@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1063316: fixed in xmorph 1:20150712-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063316,
regarding xmorph: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1063316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063316
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2024 04:57:58 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,
PGPSIGNATURE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 14; hammy, 150; neutral, 109; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--bookworm, 0.000-+--trixie,
0.000-+--langasek, 0.000-+--Langasek, 0.000-+--H*ct:application Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from becquer.dodds.net ([207.224.24.209]:42455)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:E