• Bug#1063221: pgpool2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

    From Lucas Kanashiro@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 5 19:40:01 2024
    This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.


    Source: pgpool2
    Version: 4.3.7-1
    Severity: serious
    Tags: patch pending sid trixie
    Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
    User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: time-t

    NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!

    Dear maintainer,

    As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
    pgpool2 as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
    either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
    analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
    side we assume is affected).

    To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to
    have a library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the
    runtime library package.

    Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
    to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close together in time. Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for pgpool2
    which will initially be uploaded to experimental if possible, then to
    unstable after packages have cleared binary NEW.

    Please find the patch for this NMU attached.

    If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition, there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.



    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: trixie/sid
    APT prefers unstable
    APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
    Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

    Kernel: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
    Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
    Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
    Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
    Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

    diff -Nru pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/changelog pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/changelog
    --- pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/changelog 2023-11-25 07:47:05.000000000 -0300
    +++ pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/changelog 2024-02-05 15:24:39.000000000 -0300
    @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
    +pgpool2 (4.3.7-1.1) experimental; urgency=medium
    +
    + * Non-maintainer upload.
    + * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
    +
    + -- Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@debian.org> Mon, 05 Feb 2024 15:24:39 -0300
    +
    pgpool2 (4.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium

    * New upstream version 4.3.7.
    diff -Nru pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/control pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/control
    --- pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/control 2023-11-25 07:46:36.000000000 -0300
    +++ pgpool2-4.3.7/debian/control 2024-02-05 15:24:39.000000000 -0300
    @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
    Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any
    Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
    Depends:
    - libpgpool2 (= ${binary:Version}),
    + libpgpool2t64 (= ${binary:Version}),
    lsb-base,
    postgresql-common,
    ucf,
    @@ -63,7 +63,10 @@
    .
    This is version 3 of pgpool-II, the second generation of pgpool.

    -Package: libpgpool2
    +Package: l
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 29 12:00:06 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:53:50 +0100
    with message-id <ZeBiPknhQbGmkOuj@msg.df7cb.de>
    and subject line Re: Bug#1063221: pgpool2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1063221,
    regarding pgpool2: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1063221: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1063221
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2024 18:28:10 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
    DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
    FROMDEVELOPER,MONEY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,STOCKLIKE,
    T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 37; hammy, 150; neutral, 317; spammy,
    0. spammytokens:
    hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
    0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
    0.000-+--H*RT:108, 0.000-+--H*RT:311
    Return-path: <kanashiro@debian.org>
    Rec
  • From Steve Langasek@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 2 00:10:01 2024
    please exclude pgpool2 from the t64 transition. It does ship a library package, but there are 0 external users, and all in-package rpdeps
    have strict versioned dependencies on libpgpool2.

    While I will leave this to your discretion as maintainer, please note that
    "0 external users" is not possible to determine conclusively. There are 0 external users *in Debian*. But this package ships a shared library, and a -dev package to allow software to link against it; therefore, third-party packages not included in Debian, which link against this library, may exist. If you want to be able to assert that this is not the case, it's better to
    not ship a -dev package at all for your library.

    --
    Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErEg/aN5yj0PyIC/KVo0w8yGyEz0FAmXiXdUACgkQVo0w8yGy Ez0XHw//UwFFMZyWQMLkiB6BBqhy+z0SzYDehELGAaNke6GrCloPq8QUpHi2EN+I PWXihotZh+6+FuV7pRNksBZOKJz22tBvPaiqnIr5dZc/copr5+tkz4M0kZeSOmBi GyNPZlY2NkZuMVkRP9fc9lhz3wXbB8XTGJmSVmk6Wpltn9gCqEqvlqm1hmLQfEy0 AnyCaNgTIfBBf7z5Pl8FacTktQxzq3KR39mnzMVqa+tlHXX4XbFRb4wBGy3L8Lxe J6DQ6wXpbnolstSqsV3sqF1ms1D8+rTDtWhMlmZmVol8UZZWYJjB7IBDCg+S1Wel COEte0kz+aWibkLXBgNgzsPVRJ/DfccGPe15/PSXK+usDTRFS3W/3h2iqPVD1sjn L9FAy5joix7Vtb8mEod9yFgKFE7bwNyYTB7WQIIQLnnCcMqwm3esx5S6mKp0IMsc VxwlOli8U+KcjzJGM0ACDumZM+/ghzjCm2L3hgskCbCxYgnavuk5XgrlbNhUM1ip HrfmjTWwfcQ9RpfghNiDdGkyVXLXPvEBjCIJVsh5TbP7S++XBK/Q8m01M6A69ZdA Mci+waMdQbcIoJyI5ehv