This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.


Source: ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!

Dear maintainer,

As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
ola as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
side we assume is affected).

To ensure that inconsistent combinations of libraries with their reverse-dependencies are never installed together, it is necessary to
have a library transition, which is most easily done by renaming the
runtime library package.

Since turning on 64-bit time_t is being handled centrally through a change
to the default dpkg-buildflags (https://bugs.debian.org/1037136), it is important that libraries affected by this ABI change all be uploaded close together in time. Therefore I have prepared a 0-day NMU for ola
which will initially be uploaded to experimental if possible, then to
unstable after packages have cleared binary NEW.

Please find the patch for this NMU attached.

If you have any concerns about this patch, please reach out ASAP. Although this package will be uploaded to experimental immediately, there will be a period of several days before we begin uploads to unstable; so if information becomes available that your package should not be included in the transition, there is time for us to amend the planned uploads.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.2.0-39-generic (SMP w/32 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

diff -Nru ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog
--- ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog 2023-07-28 04:48:08.000000000 -0300
+++ ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog 2024-02-03 14:36:20.000000000 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ola (0.10.9.nojsmin-4.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@debian.org> Sat, 03 Feb 2024 14:36:20 -0300
+
ola (0.10.9.nojsmin-4) unstable; urgency=medium

* no-change upload to get everything built on the buildd hosts after
diff -Nru ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control --- ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control 2023-06-25 17:41:07.000000000 -0300
+++ ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control 2024-02-03 14:36:20.000000000 -0300
@@ -76,7 +76,10 @@
This package contains olad, the OLA daemon used to control lighting,
and a number of command-line tools to control and manipulate olad.

-Package: libola1
+Package: libola1t64
+Provides: ${t64:Provides}
+Replaces: libola1
+Breaks: libola1 (<<

Hi Lucas,

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 02:39:49PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:

Source: ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!

Dear maintainer,

As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
ola as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be
analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
side we assume is affected).

Would it make sense for me to contact upstream and ask if they do
certain things? They're quite knowledgeable and might know.

If not, then no worries, but I thought I'd ask.

Thanks,

--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}

I will have a Tin-Actinium-Potassium mixture, thanks.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 09:47:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:

Hi Lucas,

On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 02:39:49PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:

Source: ola
Version: 0.10.9.nojsmin-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch pending sid trixie
Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade
User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t

NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet!

Dear maintainer,

As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond (https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time), we have identified
ola as a source package shipping runtime libraries whose ABI
either is affected by the change in size of time_t, or could not be analyzed via abi-compliance-checker (and therefore to be on the safe
side we assume is affected).

Would it make sense for me to contact upstream and ask if they do
certain things? They're quite knowledgeable and might know.

If not, then no worries, but I thought I'd ask.

nvm, just read the d-d-a mail :-)

--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}

I will have a Tin-Actinium-Potassium mixture, thanks.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.


Source: ola
Dear maintainer,

Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t
transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.

Note that this adds a versioned build-dependency on dpkg-dev, to guard
against accidental backports with a wrong ABI.

Thanks!


-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.5.0-21-generic (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

diff -Nru ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog
--- ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog 2023-07-28 07:48:08.000000000 +0000
+++ ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/changelog 2024-02-29 02:16:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ola (0.10.9.nojsmin-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition. Closes: #1062821
+
+ -- Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org> Thu, 29 Feb 2024 02:16:44 +0000
+
ola (0.10.9.nojsmin-4) unstable; urgency=medium

* no-change upload to get everything built on the buildd hosts after
diff -Nru ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control --- ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control 2023-06-25 20:41:07.000000000 +0000
+++ ola-0.10.9.nojsmin/debian/control 2024-02-29 02:16:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
Uploaders: RenZO <renzo@imaginux.com>
-Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 12), autotools-dev, dh-autoreconf, bash-completion, libcppunit-dev, bison, flex, pkg-config, uuid-d

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Thu, 29 Feb 2024 04:48:23 +0000
with message-id <E1rfYLH-009bsy-Ms@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1062821: fixed in ola 0.10.9.nojsmin-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062821,
regarding ola: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1062821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2024 17:39:55 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FOURLA,
FROMDEVELOPER,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,
UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST,
XMAILER_REPORTBUG autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 33; hammy, 150; neutral, 258; spammy,
0. spammytokens:
hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path: <kanashiro@debian.org>
Received: from stra