--sOWQfFKRcC6yTgyU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Control: tags -1 - pending patch

Unfortunately, it turns out that due to the use of d-shlibs this patch is insufficient. d-shlibs appears to need patching for every ABI transition,
and only knows about the long-finished c102, ldbl, and v5 transitions (which misses several other ABI transitions that have happened).

So removing the 'pending' tag for the moment, I guess we need to go patch d-shlibs to know about t64.

Also while debugging this I noticed that the conversion script didn't appropriate handle strict versioned dependencies on libsquid1; so here is an updated patch that includes that, though it is still incomplete because debian/rules will also need updating once d-shlibs supports t64.

--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

--sOWQfFKRcC6yTgyU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nmu_biosquid.debdiff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -Nru biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog
--- biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog 2024-01-14 13:29:59.000000000 +0000
+++ biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog 2024-01-30 04:35:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+biosquid (1.9g+cvs20050121-13.1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:35:51 +0000
+
biosquid (1.9g+cvs20050

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.


Source: biosquid
Version: 1.9g+cvs20050121-15
Followup-For: Bug #1061931

Hi Andreas,

FYI your emails did not make it to my mailserver because they fail SPF
for your sending domain; it appears your mails are going via the Debian mailservers but you are using a non-Debian sender address? So I've seen
your messages only via the web interface.

In any case, thanks for the quick fix regarding d-shlibs. My patch
needed fixing anyway because the conversion script failed to fix
depends: on the old library package name. Attached is the updated
patch, which includes both your d-shlibs changes and the further
debian/control changes. I've verified that it builds, and uploaded it
to experimental now.

Regards,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

diff -Nru biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog
--- biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog 2024-01-30 10:50:46.000000000 +0000
+++ biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/changelog 2024-01-31 09:25:27.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+biosquid (1.9g+cvs20050121-15.1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Rename libraries for 64-bit time_t transition.
+ * Versioned Build-Depends: d-shlibs (>= 0.106) to support --t64 option
+ * Add --t64 option to d-shlibmove
+ * d-slibs checks for Conflicts: libsquid1 (rather than Breaks)
+
+ -- Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:25:27 +0000
+
biosquid (1.9g+cvs20050121-15) unstable; urgency=medium

* Revert changes of latest upload that should have gone to experimental
diff -Nru biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/control biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/control
--- biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/control 2024-01-30 10:50:46.000000000 +0000
+++ biosquid-1.9g+cvs20050121/debian/control 2024-01-31 09:24:49.000000000 +0000
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Section: scie