Package: src:ufw
Version: 0.36.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12

With python3-defaults from experimental, the package fails to build:

[...]
======================================================================
ERROR: test_write_to_file (tests.unit.test_util.UtilTestCase.test_write_to_file)
Test write_to_file() ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/unit/test_util.py", line 607, in test_write_to_file
self.assertEquals(out, search)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AttributeError: 'UtilTestCase' object has no attribute 'assertEquals'.
Did you mean: 'assertEqual'?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 49 tests in 0.211s

FAILED (errors=24)

------------------
Unit tests summary
------------------
Total=8 (Passed=2, Failed=6)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Wed, 31 Jan 2024 15:47:52 +0000
with message-id <E1rVCoa-00GUwO-Nt@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1061763: fixed in ufw 0.36.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061763,
regarding ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1061763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2024 12:48:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,
SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 145; neutral, 32; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--trixie,
0.000-+--H*RU:sk:einhorn
Return-path: <doko@debian.org>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:54753 helo=einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de)
by buxtehude.debian.org wi

Processing control commands:

reopen -1

Bug #1061763 {Done: Jamie Strandboge <jdstrand@ubuntu.com>} [src:ufw] ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions ufw/0.36.2-2.

--
1061763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Control: reopen -1

still fails to build with Python 3.12:

Performing tests 'good/reports'
- installing
- result:
FAIL:
4a5,8

/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/testarea/lib/python/ufw/util.py:483:

SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\.'

quads = re.split('\.', nm) /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/tests/testarea/lib/python/ufw/util.py:745:

SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\s'

tmp = re.split('\s', out)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Fri, 2 Feb 2024 08:33:12 -0600
with message-id <Zbz9KHVcuYXyxNhd@iolanthe>
and subject line Re: Processed: still fails to build with Python 3.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061763,
regarding ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1061763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2024 12:48:22 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,FORGED_SPF_HELO,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,
SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 145; neutral, 32; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--pkgbuilddir,
0.000-+--PKGBUILDDIR, 0.000-+--H*F:U*doko, 0.000-+--trixie,
0.000-+--H*RU:sk:einhorn
Return-path: <doko@debian.org>
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:54753 helo=einhorn-mail-out.in-berlin.de)
by buxtehude.debian.org wi