• Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in

    From Steve Langasek@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 22 20:40:02 2024
    Package: calamares
    Version: 3.3.0-1
    Severity: serious
    User: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: time-t

    Hi Jonathan,

    Analysis of the archive for the 64-bit time_t transition[0][1] identifies calamares as a package shipping a library whose ABI changes on 32-bit architectures with 64-bit time_t.

    However, calamares's shlibs file declares a dependency on a library package name that contains no ABI information:

    $ cat DEBIAN/shlibs
    libcalamares 3.3 calamares (>= 3.3.0)
    libcalamaresui 3.3 calamares (>= 3.3.0)
    $

    It is therefore not obvious that we should rename the package to 'calamares-t64' as part of this transition.

    Looking at the archive, there are packages built from separate source
    packages, 'calamares-extensions' and 'calamares-settings-mobian', which
    depend on this library.

    Since there is no self-evident thing to do with the library package name
    here, we will not be handling this package as part of the mass NMUs.
    Instead I am filing a serious bug because partial upgrades from bookworm to trixie on 32-bit architectures (upgrading calamares without also upgrading worker) will result in ABI skew and may result in broken behavior.

    However, since calamares is an installer, maybe upgrades are a non-issue and all you need is to ensure rebuilds of the three packages in unstable.

    Thanks,
    --
    Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org

    [0] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
    [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/01/msg00041.html

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErEg/aN5yj0PyIC/KVo0w8yGyEz0FAmWuw18ACgkQVo0w8yGy Ez13rw/9FZR2iSIafQV/ZHuU2G+I5sQfRM9jvP1lWPz/AWc6Psnlz+JaANQNKj+B wumN314ytmhollNNmKlB9l6UOS/XoTmR62phpJYHmw8aUoEW8si6m+B/OHGUKI8N R+QG4TKzku6UqM500gKh/KDQGdULyvJwWhBLFinbaJBbOK3gvipFEpQJeWwPnuKr gT+We5+wm5O1l95QA9vqw7ZJsarSAZwCZSu/0+MBCKtGFXaqtGwwzRORqt0EhAmM u7VlUpTHA+Gb4b1QoMXUbwei1uWjNzehR7krPrFJnvISaXlPrtdpNSLIzzJHF2po vVAfdIWvfkYDtREXzhwFEpOBSJrw94EBZJi90wCninOj5sl71yFFkxT9APukPrfK Pb7ZgS+CKUF8Aanq+98khLSIhpZiMgz9EJ9bOCX09ylLGGCmFu+IxLrMrDeJ4Cyr YEFx1z52fTM1NvS5oY45kfpTslOYqc28
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 4 06:00:01 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Sun, 4 Feb 2024 15:53:54 +1100
    with message-id <67013ce0-fbbd-43a9-ae55-f8f64421b59b@undef.tools>
    and subject line Re: Bug#1061330: calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1061330,
    regarding calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1061330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061330
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2024 19:35:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,PGPSIGNATURE,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 150; neutral, 74; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--bookworm, 0.000-+--trixie,
    0.000-+--langasek, 0.000-+--Langasek, 0.000-+--H*ct:application Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
    Received: from becquer.dodds.net ([207.224.24.209]:33323)
    by buxte
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 4 08:40:01 2024
    Processing control commands:

    reopen -1
    Bug #1061330 {Done: Jarrah Gosbell <debian@undef.tools>} [calamares] calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
    Bug reopened
    Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1061330 to the same values previously set
    notfixed -1 calamares/3.3.1-1
    Bug #1061330 [calamares] calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
    Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1061330 to the same values previously set

    --
    1061330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061330
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 23 21:30:02 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:18:51 +0200
    with message-id <d32ec20f-29db-4d82-b448-f9c4e5df9d7c@debian.org>
    and subject line
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1061330,
    regarding calamares: identified for time_t transition but no ABI in shlibs
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1061330: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061330
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2024 19:35:04 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-120.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
    BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
    DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,PGPSIGNATURE,
    SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST,
    USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 150; neutral, 74; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--bookworm, 0.000-+--trixie,
    0.000-+--langasek, 0.000-+--Langasek, 0.000-+--H*ct:application Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
    Received: from becquer.dodds.net ([207.224.24.209]:33323)
    by buxte