severity 877016 serious
thanks
Am Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:51:30AM -0700 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
Package: cpufrequtils...
Version: 008-1
is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now?
Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging.
Bumping the severity to RC to move forward with this for trixie.
On Sun, Sep 03, 2023 at 08:26:00PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
severity 877016 serious
thanks
Am Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 06:51:30AM -0700 schrieb Mattia Dongili:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:16:52PM -0400, Phil Susi wrote:
Package: cpufrequtils...
Version: 008-1
is the case, should cpufrequtils not be removed now?
Yes, indeed it should. Thanks for nagging.
Bumping the severity to RC to move forward with this for trixie.
$ dak rm -nR cpufrequtils
Will remove the following packages from unstable:
cpufrequtils | 008-2 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, s390x
libcpufreq-dev | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
libcpufreq-dev | 008-2+b1 | riscv64
libcpufreq0 | 008-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
libcpufreq0 | 008-2+b1 | riscv64
Maintainer: Seunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
------------------- Reason -------------------
----------------------------------------------
Checking reverse dependencies...
No dependency problem found.
Seems like it's good to go?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 11:22:16 |
Calls: | 6,666 |
Files: | 12,213 |
Messages: | 5,336,376 |