• Bug#1059970: fitspng: autopkgtest regression in testing

    From Graham Inggs@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 10:30:03 2024
    Source: fitspng
    Version: 2.0-1
    Severity: serious
    Tags: sid trixie
    User: debian-ci@lists.debian.org
    Usertags: regression

    Hi Maintainer

    Sometime between 2023-12-10 and 2024-01-3, fitspng's autopkgtests
    started to fail in testing [1]. I've copied what I hope is the
    relevant part of the log below.

    Regards
    Graham


    [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/fitspng/testing/amd64/


    18s autopkgtest [06:35:13]: test check: [-----------------------
    19s OK: hippo.png (139x152, 24-bit RGB, non-interlaced, 38.7%).
    19s zlib warning: different version (expected 1.2.13, using 1.3)
    19s
    19s autopkgtest [06:35:14]: test check: -----------------------]

    19s autopkgtest [06:35:14]: test check: - - - - - - - - - - results -
    - - - - - - - - -
    19s check FAIL stderr: zlib warning: different version (expected
    1.2.13, using 1.3)
    19s autopkgtest [06:35:14]: test check: - - - - - - - - - - stderr - -
    - - - - - - - -
    19s zlib warning: different version (expected 1.2.13, using 1.3)
    19s

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 30 23:00:01 2024
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 30 Jan 2024 21:50:20 +0000
    with message-id <E1rUvzo-00D0bS-3E@fasolo.debian.org>
    and subject line Bug#1059970: fixed in fitspng 2.0-2
    has caused the Debian Bug report #1059970,
    regarding fitspng: autopkgtest regression in testing
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    1059970: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059970
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jan 2024 09:19:15 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,
    FUZZY_CPILL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,
    SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham
    autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 24; hammy, 117; neutral, 32; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--autopkgtest, 0.000-+--trixie,
    0.000-+--H*RU:198.252.153.129,
    0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:mx1.riseup.net,
    0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:198.252.153.129
    Return-path: <ginggs@debian.org>
    Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:57124)
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps