Source: cython
Version: 3.0.7-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python3.12

Hi Maintainer

cython's autopkgtests fail with Python 3.12 on 32-bit architectures
[1][2][3]. I've copied what I
hope is the relevant part of the log below.

Regards
Graham


[1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cython/testing/armel/
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cython/testing/armhf/
[3] https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/cython/testing/i386/


8361s ====================================================================== 8361s FAIL: test_raiseMemError (test_unicode.UnicodeTest.test_raiseMemError) 8361s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 8361s Traceback (most recent call last):
8361s File "tests/run/test_unicode.pyx", line 2355, in test_unicode.UnicodeTest.test_raiseMemError (test_unicode.c:144223)
8361s self.assertRaises(MemoryError, alloc)
8361s AssertionError: MemoryError not raised by lambda
8361s
8361s ====================================================================== 8361s FAIL: test_raiseMemError (test_unicode.UnicodeTest.test_raiseMemError) 8361s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 8361s Traceback (most recent call last):
8361s File "tests/run/test_unicode.pyx", line 2355, in test_unicode.UnicodeTest.test_raiseMemError (test_unicode.cpp:144235)
8361s self.assertRaises(MemoryError, alloc)
8361s AssertionError: MemoryError not raised by lambda
8361s
8361s ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 8361s Ran 7570 tests in 8252.568s
8361s
8361s FAILED (failures=2, skipped=16)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Your message dated Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:34:34 +0000
with message-id <E1rxKPq-00026C-Sh@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1059835: fixed in cython 3.0.10+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059835,
regarding cython: autopkgtest regression with Python 3.12 on 32-bit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


--
1059835: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059835
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jan 2024 09:50:58 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2021-04-09) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,FROMDEVELOPER,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.6-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 23; hammy, 129; neutral, 32; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--autopkgtest, 0.000-+--armhf,
0.000-+--U*debian-python, 0.000-+--debianpythonlistsdebianorg,
0.000-+--debian-python@lists.debian.org
Return-path: <ginggs@debian.org>
Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]:37712)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.94.2)
(