1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. LINUX.DEBIAN.DEVEL.TESTIN

  • Bug#818510: upgrade-reports: excellent upgrade experience on Lenovo E43

    From anarcat@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 17 19:10:04 2016
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    Package: upgrade-reports
    Severity: minor

    I just upgraded my friend's laptop from the latest Wheezy to the latest Jessie without a hitch!

    Things went really smoothly. I changed the sources.list by hand, ran apt-get upgrade; apt-get dist-upgrade and everything went almost perfectly.

    For some reason, db5.1-util and unoconv were not correctly upgraded on dist-upgrade. Running dist-upgrade fixed the latter, but not the former. I eneded up just purging db5.1-util.

    autoremove didn't catch everything: a bunch of packages were "obsolete" according to aptitude and I had to remove those by hand. it would be nice if the upgrade process would cover those as well. this includes python 2.6, the older kernel, openjdk 6, gcc 4.6 and a bunch more random libs that clutter the system.

    otherwise everything seems to be going well so far. the user's only complaint so far is that the minimize button is gone from gnome, but she figured out she can click on the window in the window list to achieve the same result.

    mission accomplished! although ideally, *she* would have been able to do the upgrade herself. maybe next time!

    a.

    PS: this is not really a bug report, more of a "good job" to whoever is receiving those messages. :) of course if you think some bug reports should be open for specific issues, I'll be glad to follow any pointer!

    -- System Information:
    Debian Release: 8.3
    APT prefers stable-updates
    APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
    Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
    Foreign Architectures: i386

    Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
    Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
    Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
    Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Allombert@21:1/5 to anarcat on Thu Mar 17 21:00:03 2016
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:59:58PM -0400, anarcat wrote:
    autoremove didn't catch everything: a bunch of packages were "obsolete" according to aptitude and I had to remove those by hand. it would be nice if the upgrade process would cover those as well. this includes python 2.6, the older kernel, openjdk 6, gcc 4.6 and a bunch more random libs that clutter the
    system.

    It is dangerous to remove them since some users might still have non-dpkg-installed software depending on them.

    Cheers,
    --
    Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

    Imagine a large red swirl here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Haricophile@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 18 00:50:02 2016
    XPost: linux.debian.bugs.dist

    Le Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:59:58 -0400,
    anarcat <anarcat@debian.org> a écrit :

    otherwise everything seems to be going well so far. the user's only
    complaint so far is that the minimize button is gone from gnome, but
    she figured out she can click on the window in the window list to
    achieve the same result.

    You can set that with dconf-editor | gsettings but is it required...

    --
    haricophile@aranha.fr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 9 22:00:02 2021
    This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

    Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2021 21:55:37 +0100
    with message-id <43b04122-a47b-31d6-d220-2540e920dc6b@debian.org>
    and subject line upgrade report for EOL Debian release
    has caused the Debian Bug report #818510,
    regarding upgrade-reports: excellent upgrade experience on Lenovo E431
    to be marked as done.

    This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
    If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
    Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

    (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
    message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
    immediately.)


    --
    818510: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818510
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2016 18:00:01 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    (2014-02-07) on buxtehude.debian.org
    X-Spam-Level:
    X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,
    FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,HELO_MISC_IP,SUBENDNUM,XMAILER_REPORTBUG,
    X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
    version=3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
    X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 7; hammy, 150; neutral, 118; spammy,
    0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--systemd, 0.000-+--H*x:6.6.3,
    0.000-+--H*UA:6.6.3, 0.000-+--H*M:reportbug, 0.000-+--31604amd64 Return-path: <anarcat@debian.org>
    Received: from marcos.anarc.at ([206.248.172.91] helo=[127.0.1.1])
    by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
    (envelope-from <anarcat@debian.org>)
    id 1agcDI-0007Z2-J8
    for submit@bugs.debian.o