On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 04:10:42PM -0400, Roberto C. Sรกnchez wrote:
Something like a 3:1 majority would ensure that the measure had a very broad consensus behind it. I would like to think that it would result
in more constructive discussions.
Nothing prevents more than one option with a 3:1 majority when there are several options that are widely considered acceptable on the ballot.
To make an example of a 3:1 majority requirement for public statements:
Option 1: kittens are super cute
Option 2: kittens are cute
Option 3: kittens are not cute
If option 1 has a 3:1 majority:
- option 2 might also have a 3:1 majority,
- but option 3 would be unlikely to have a 3:1 majority
[...]Option 1: kittens are super cute
Option 2: kittens are cute
Option 3: kittens are not cute
I very much hope Option 3 loses out to FD!
Anybody up to set this up? ๐ฅบ๐
๐
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 70:40:30 |
Calls: | 6,656 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,332,157 |
Posted today: | 1 |