unarchive 970132Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
thanksStopping processing here.
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 970132Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1 Unarchived Bug 970132
Hi,
On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 23:36 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 970132Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1 Unarchived Bug 970132
I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as I'm
not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other - please do
not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should be
tracked in a new bug.
If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:02:34PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:[...]
I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as
I'm
not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other -
please do
not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should
be
tracked in a new bug.
If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.
Hi Adam,
I was attempting to follow-up with Adrian concerning his last message
about the armel build failure. I downloaded the bug as mbox, then
replied to Adrian and the bug but the reply to the bug was rejected
because it was archived. I tried to unarchive and subscribe then
reply again, but I that didn't work either (it seems because I didn't
allow sufficient time for the unarchive to process before re-sending
the reply).
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 86:37:50 |
Calls: | 6,658 |
Files: | 12,203 |
Messages: | 5,333,788 |