• Processed: unarchiving 970132

    From Debian Bug Tracking System@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 20 00:40:01 2021
    Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

    unarchive 970132
    Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1
    Unarchived Bug 970132
    thanks
    Stopping processing here.

    Please contact me if you need assistance.
    --
    970132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970132
    Debian Bug Tracking System
    Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam D. Barratt@21:1/5 to Debian Bug Tracking System on Sat Nov 20 14:10:01 2021
    Hi,

    On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 23:36 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
    Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

    unarchive 970132
    Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1 Unarchived Bug 970132

    I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as I'm
    not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other - please do
    not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should be
    tracked in a new bug.

    If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.

    Regards,

    Adam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roberto =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_S=E1nch@21:1/5 to Adam D. Barratt on Sat Nov 20 16:40:01 2021
    On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:02:34PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
    Hi,

    On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 23:36 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
    Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

    unarchive 970132
    Bug #970132 {Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>} [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package rustc/1.41.1+dfsg1-1~deb10u1 Unarchived Bug 970132

    I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as I'm
    not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other - please do
    not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should be
    tracked in a new bug.

    If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.

    Hi Adam,

    I was attempting to follow-up with Adrian concerning his last message
    about the armel build failure. I downloaded the bug as mbox, then
    replied to Adrian and the bug but the reply to the bug was rejected
    because it was archived. I tried to unarchive and subscribe then reply
    again, but I that didn't work either (it seems because I didn't allow sufficient time for the unarchive to process before re-sending the
    reply).

    I definitely intend to open a new bug for the 1.51 upload I am preparing
    now. If it would be better for the old bug to be archived and for no
    further discussion to take place in that bug, then I can go ahead and
    archive it again, or you can.

    Regards,

    -Roberto

    --
    Roberto C. Sánchez

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam D. Barratt@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 20 21:10:01 2021
    On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 10:36 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
    On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 01:02:34PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
    [...]
    I realise this was only unarchived, rather than re-opened, but as
    I'm
    not sure why you'd do one without intending to do the other -
    please do
    not re-use the old bug for any further rustc uploads; those should
    be
    tracked in a new bug.

    If I've misunderstood the intention then apologies.

    Hi Adam,

    I was attempting to follow-up with Adrian concerning his last message
    about the armel build failure. I downloaded the bug as mbox, then
    replied to Adrian and the bug but the reply to the bug was rejected
    because it was archived. I tried to unarchive and subscribe then
    reply again, but I that didn't work either (it seems because I didn't
    allow sufficient time for the unarchive to process before re-sending
    the reply).

    Ah, I see. Thanks for the explanation, and confirming that I needn't
    have worried.

    Regards,

    Adam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)