• Re: New proposed-updates diff: libapache2-mod-rivet 3.2.1-1

    From Adam D. Barratt@21:1/5 to Debian Queue Viewer on Sat Nov 13 21:30:02 2021
    Hi,

    On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 20:03 +0000, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
    Version in base suite: 3.2.0-1

    Base version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.0-1
    Target version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.1-1

    +libapache2-mod-rivet (3.2.1-1) stable; urgency=medium
    +
    + * New upstream release.
    + * New rivet version addresses issue with multiple AM_AUTOMAKE_INIT
    + expansion (Closes: #998490).
    + * Correcting the name of the target directory where rivet library and
    + Tcl scripts are moved into (it still had the old 3.1 version name)

    I'm assuming that you intended to upload this to unstable, not stable.
    If targetting stable was actually intentional, then I'm afraid that you
    need to fix the issue in unstable before we can consider accepting it
    for stable.

    Any upload to stable should also be accompanied by a "p-u" bug filed
    against release.debian.org, which would need to explain why a larger
    release should be accepted, rather than a smaller targetted fix.

    Regards,

    Adam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sven Hoexter@21:1/5 to Adam D. Barratt on Sun Nov 14 20:50:02 2021
    On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 08:27:39PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
    Hi,

    On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 20:03 +0000, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
    Version in base suite: 3.2.0-1

    Base version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.0-1
    Target version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.1-1

    +libapache2-mod-rivet (3.2.1-1) stable; urgency=medium
    +
    + * New upstream release.
    + * New rivet version addresses issue with multiple AM_AUTOMAKE_INIT
    + expansion (Closes: #998490).
    + * Correcting the name of the target directory where rivet library and
    + Tcl scripts are moved into (it still had the old 3.1 version name)

    I'm assuming that you intended to upload this to unstable, not stable.
    If targetting stable was actually intentional, then I'm afraid that you
    need to fix the issue in unstable before we can consider accepting it
    for stable.

    Hello Adam,
    yes that was intended to be uploaded to unstable, I missed the issue and
    I screwed that up as the sponsor. Please remove the package from the queue.

    Sorry for the noise.

    Regards,
    Sven

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEfAcX+forK514ixQbptwk2dokk9EFAmGRZBYACgkQptwk2dok k9F0Zg/+Pqvln0F7nUhTAM0LdpCV12Xm74FJaBZ4Tw6jjv/pQjvFEc5Khi7agJLR CkHs0UUfNW7CgFU/9PCKTYw50hB9zBS1bQFWy3tWZ5fScsum6pUKKES/mEOkYy3A gtcXIx2pG2rBseZJyBY1wRWFzFJ9goMpvgMn6aHp6K0xYlS0vjQI0MXa9dCNFcCb FjqV2IGVZIGdpEh36sfPF1in4ibRzI8c0s0/5fC0Zq5EMKWIpJgh1jCW0KrECAmE KdeMtfrcEjI+VO7D5kK5s5lNguvuJ5mVXycV45esyOjfpy8ym3MWejX9KuZVC8Db d2tKzT8T2zdSADLrmfSEMk1xVBVC0LIMYfEn4BXPAumtLRsen9bLmv9JaBN6juFD FpUTO7drHyJTeyW3FSDEjn3cN7pA3w62juOcf8fbU2mahhcAzcVMxRncWdynEp6s J5stncttpdIHeSWoK7gwYvVp5Bl8+GmRzjLaWDgjYQtf6QdpD4IXEENre7HiirL/ CG4Jyn+ciOTfTeW+eouX2bXf8n2tr4QCx6cVI08+7xFdzS3HOq7gS3sCMAlIC4Sd hgO9P5vM0UNzRhq9tPkP5MnDH4uj3xNTi6GQ9DoE9ggAx3HUp7NBp+LLA9XB+N0b wcAtYisfWicPp/wYjuuLD8DMnZQDGAtlK7b4buIqWcYuqRBJp24=
    =1Uge
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam D. Barratt@21:1/5 to Sven Hoexter on Mon Nov 15 20:00:03 2021
    On Sun, 2021-11-14 at 20:31 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
    On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 08:27:39PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
    Hi,

    On Sat, 2021-11-13 at 20:03 +0000, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
    Version in base suite: 3.2.0-1

    Base version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.0-1
    Target version: libapache2-mod-rivet_3.2.1-1

    +libapache2-mod-rivet (3.2.1-1) stable; urgency=medium
    +
    + * New upstream release.
    + * New rivet version addresses issue with multiple
    AM_AUTOMAKE_INIT
    + expansion (Closes: #998490).
    + * Correcting the name of the target directory where rivet
    library and
    + Tcl scripts are moved into (it still had the old 3.1 version
    name)

    I'm assuming that you intended to upload this to unstable, not
    stable.
    If targetting stable was actually intentional, then I'm afraid that
    you
    need to fix the issue in unstable before we can consider accepting
    it
    for stable.

    Hello Adam,
    yes that was intended to be uploaded to unstable, I missed the issue
    and I screwed that up as the sponsor. Please remove the package from
    the queue.

    Thanks for confirming. Flagged for rejection, pending dak actioning the request.

    Regards,

    Adam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)