• Uploading linux (6.1.25-1)

    From Salvatore Bonaccorso@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 22 09:40:01 2023
    XPost: linux.debian.kernel

    Hi

    I would like to upload another Linux upload, version 6.1.25-1 to
    unstable (aimed to move to bookworm).

    It consists of importing as usual the new stable series, 6.1.21 up to
    6.1.25 including CVE fixes for CVE-2023-1583, CVE-2023-1611,
    CVE-2023-1859, CVE-2023-1989, CVE-2023-1990, CVE-2023-2194,
    CVE-2023-30456 and CVE-2023-30772. Additionally a fix for #1033329 is
    included upstream.

    We have again an ABI bump icluded.

    Other packaging changes:

    * Bump ABI to 8
    * [arm64] drivers/net/can: Enable CAN_C_CAN, CAN_C_CAN_PLATFORM, CAN_M_CAN and
    CAN_M_CAN_PLATFORM as module.
    Move configuration enablement to arm64 specific configuration.

    the latter is needed due to https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/698 the
    respective settings were not correctly enabled.

    Noteworthy is that https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/695 the
    regression for Open Firmware framebuffer, #1033058 is *not* yet
    included, as there was no ack upstream on Cyril's proposed patchset.

    I'm following the exact same strategy for those imports as we would do
    for the point release, but cannot exclude there are no regreessions.

    From d-i/boot point of view I have an IRC ack from Cyril that the
    upload is ok, but potentially the upcoming next d-i release will be
    based on 6.1.20-2 in testing. So next week we might need to decide if
    moving 6.1.25-1 to testing or hold it back for after the d-i release.

    Regards,
    Salvatore

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQKTBAABCgB9FiEERkRAmAjBceBVMd3uBUy48xNDz0QFAmRDjV1fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDQ2 NDQ0MDk4MDhDMTcxRTA1NTMxRERFRTA1NENCOEYzMTM0M0NGNDQACgkQBUy48xND z0RpNw//QFEnmtN0yLEXus55KP4vRktIfc6Y/xKEPaPQQAjyUB+tZItFExCGmT5m yFLVzvkjhxt5Bsc8URCnAMSYrs4NKy8F5ZJIzXmJGA3eygmwWdd7C5tE5jnV58o8 +0nbafvMcx4nlow69ei/s7vjeSPNJ49yhlFpSLw4BYpOmM2HiWxxLCAnDu4XpPug sd3SdvRZ4Vh6idtN+diCxsBMeZ74J/UrkZEcTqgdBa2SxO7FuIC3VpnUY+Fc9ZxX HDHsa5tVsb66SzjvJtekkIwmGfI49rtcEG59f42Ik0MJOweXphvGSRlShoSFRw2b 4sbxjX71RLRelB7G6EDemTIDBQk1p2bAejRcSOpr9ekDSnjq66cji2B0a7AXI9bq 8tpP7UuzeTxbRNLUivYVW5VnLAk0zYxxKU9eeXukF1Yd2y7GtdSn/FFxJHRGGM3b J1XBVWa1lo3f8T2Ke+5l1fleLBCaSEx1QkKM2DAnV3v5ZzVzwOwiPLwvrqydQrzW DgfjKiXMczBIaf7Y7RISIoJqTYbZfFvP0XhXKK+81/Mx+OHI46e9DrjHmGQ53Ih4 pn7+VS4VtP7T5gqzxMgcwDKhbla1hO42a+M8v9/lq6PRxcO9FykmER/Q3hMUQ178 CasD5us5S2I91acnV40EowAtdqadsfxOfM4MpCPnROdvJAL2tpM=
    =0aBJ
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cyril Brulebois@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 22 12:10:01 2023
    XPost: linux.debian.kernel

    Hi,

    Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (2023-04-22):
    Noteworthy is that https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/-/merge_requests/695 the regression for Open Firmware framebuffer, #1033058 is *not* yet
    included, as there was no ack upstream on Cyril's proposed patchset.

    Just in:
    I've applied the series (2 patches, one of them in drm) to the fbdev git tree.

    https://lore.kernel.org/all/9f6547e5-ba5d-11bf-3646-2f65b4a6a2ea@gmx.de/

    From d-i/boot point of view I have an IRC ack from Cyril that the
    upload is ok, but potentially the upcoming next d-i release will be
    based on 6.1.20-2 in testing. So next week we might need to decide if
    moving 6.1.25-1 to testing or hold it back for after the d-i release.

    Please let me know once you consider 6.1.25-1 ready for migration. Since
    we're looking at a release date in June, we have some time to work on
    several D-I release candidates if we want to, so we can either hold
    linux in unstable a little to publish the d-i RC, or we can hold the RC
    a little, let linux into testing, and publish d-i once we've toyed with
    the new linux a little more.

    (If we were aiming at a release on May 13 as was envisioned for a little
    while, I would definitely prioritize getting the d-i RC out ASAP, and
    consider linux only after that, though.)


    Cheers,
    --
    Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
    D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmRDsR4ACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSCdPQ//Vw6vw4Hm4Rotoj8pY9sV7xSWDVXu8/hethNHRLaqEhlntGdqAERPEjzD nc3qqC5qMwhC7m7RuzxhzRa/LlS9cim+inkME8s/gRkJ82bdS5E8FnrxOzNMI0QG Ryl4dt5cuoQ1Ps8tzoC5yZvK25xb3ye/TYScMEbn/ZKOJWiUsUNf5NSpe4G3mkS8 o5pSmdi6IuouYQty0gANBcXrnU4FGjUG7pupue62QnKarZgqwCPowDRSWeqBqJuT CmZsMPBSc7LkO2+FhWIZBd/NK7C/o7rNxDO7TQ3lHVNWd1FoFBK0wqBAZxVL3KF7 UQNcjtbRAAx+ocAlykXfOmznsTdPO3sAobeFyEtYwtFmJS4jjb5RZCZ412lZQbHT LQJkNzwO0CO9wfWBinghQtrIeYtwuVjBbGCedigKZpdUb/U8We+WUl+exCUvlS6/ 5J3pbZ6G6Rysv0AFKio7WgwY1PcZLsaYBfaTczuXSP3zX6bppRdSuAyeFa9o1yYO hbPNER97JQOQhqiYSiSWCDiWa/Pv4utNpSI56rnCzVU26W8/2oRiTR9TLbiO9crG JXeOzO9U2Dkl9vkoUR5zXMNWUZaMWld8r9yTwbA150dgapoC4hcYhd7YiaW+2sux V0I4bOud3C87LqT3nHuygjeDIhFOfGrd5rUPvSgkdBobYSHuLcI=
    =MW2l
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    *