I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does not have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.) Do I need some sort of manual nudging here?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does not
have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the
source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.) Do I need
some sort of manual nudging here?
Nevermind, it seems it was still stuck in the architecture list of one of the subpackages further down!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 65:40:12 |
Calls: | 6,691 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,228 |
Messages: | 5,345,874 |
Posted today: | 1 |