I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does not have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.) Do I need some sort of manual nudging here?
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:25:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I don't understand why it considers ppc64el to be important. 2.1.0-2 does not
have a build for ppc64el, and ppc64el is not in the architecture list of the
source package. (There is a ppc64el build in stable, for 2.0.1-3.) Do I need
some sort of manual nudging here?
Nevermind, it seems it was still stuck in the architecture list of one of the subpackages further down!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 438 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 242:38:35 |
Calls: | 9,145 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,432 |
D/L today: |
1 files (2,685K bytes) |
Messages: | 6,039,842 |