for several days, the status of the debian translations are not
updated, it looks like the robot does not parse the lists (or does not
update the pages afterwards).
Example:
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
lists slm still as pending, but the Report has already been filed in
the BTS (and this was sent to the list): >https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00021.html
And the overview page has been updated several times already …
Is there any issue known?
Am 18. Juni 2024 18:40:48 MESZ schrieb Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>:
Hello,
for several days, the status of the debian translations are not
updated, it looks like the robot does not parse the lists (or does not >update the pages afterwards).
Example:
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
lists slm still as pending, but the Report has already been filed in
the BTS (and this was sent to the list): >https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00021.html
The robot works fine, as can seen on its coordination pages: <https://l10n.debian.org/coordination/german/de.by_status.html>
Look for slm.
And the overview page has been updated several times already …
Is there any issue known?
I cannot see anything yet.
The cron jobs on tye were fine for many weeks now...
Hello Holger,
Am Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:22:29PM +0200 schrieb Holger Wansing:
Am 18. Juni 2024 18:40:48 MESZ schrieb Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de>:
Hello,
for several days, the status of the debian translations are not
updated, it looks like the robot does not parse the lists (or does not
update the pages afterwards).
Example:
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
lists slm still as pending, but the Report has already been filed in
the BTS (and this was sent to the list):
https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00021.html
The robot works fine, as can seen on its coordination pages:
<https://l10n.debian.org/coordination/german/de.by_status.html>
Look for slm.
Indeed, thanks for checking.
And the overview page has been updated several times already …
Is there any issue known?
I cannot see anything yet.
The cron jobs on tye were fine for many weeks now...
So the pages on www.debian.org, like >https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
are currently not picking it up.
Can someone check the website part?
So the pages on www.debian.org, like >https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
are currently not picking it up.
Can someone check the website part?
Apologies, I couldn't find time to look at this until today; now I see that the coordination page says "Last Built: Wed, Jun 26 15:35:49 UTC 2024 " and slm is in green 100%
Can anybody confirm if there is an issue or it solved by itself?
Am Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:23:49PM +0200 schrieb Laura Arjona Reina:
So the pages on www.debian.org, like
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/de
are currently not picking it up.
Can someone check the website part?
Apologies, I couldn't find time to look at this until today; now I see that the coordination page says "Last Built: Wed, Jun 26 15:35:49 UTC 2024 " and slm is in green 100%
Can anybody confirm if there is an issue or it solved by itself?
I can confirm it works again.
The robot status pages like <https://l10n.debian.org/coordination/german/de.by_status.html>
show, there is an open l10n bug for German for the slm package
existing, and this true, so debian.org should tell the same, but it
does not.
There is something definilety broken in the stats page, also for Spanish (ES) language:
BAD / NOT SYNCED
https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/es
GOOD / SYNCED https://l10n.debian.org/coordination/spanish/es.by_translator.html#Camale%C3%B3n
It's quite frustrating (that is, «dis-cou-ra-ging») for translators not getting accurate information on their job and, at least to me, these
kind of «madness things» makes me doing lots of duplicated work and tons
of errors.
If it were not because I DO (REALLY REALLY... I mean, «really») LOVE Debian's way of life, and all what it represents (software, people and philosophy) I would have quitted from helping with translations time
ago >:-P
I remember similar issues in the past: that errors in packages broke the updating of the status pages.
So, that's not an issue with the webpage!
Well, I'm a bit «tired» (read it «softly, in the right meaning) of translating po-debconf templates that are not being updated/uploaded,
for instance:
El 2024-06-30 a las 11:33 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:[...]
¹https://i18n.debian.org/material/po/unstable/main/s/slm/debian/po/slm_0.9-3_es.po.gz
El 2024-06-30 a las 11:33 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
Well, I'm a bit «tired» (read it «softly, in the right meaning) of >translating po-debconf templates that are not being updated/uploaded,
for instance:
****
slm¹
lyksom-server
kwartz-client
zoph
nodm
unattended-upgrades
minissdpd
watchdog
nbd
gitolite3
****
Not sure why these templates are not showing in the stats page as
«fully translated (100%)», not sure what I am missing here (?) because
BTS is done but files are not reaching unstable repository¹ or not
properly synced.
El 2024-06-30 a las 22:53 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
Am 30. Juni 2024 17:36:32 MESZ schrieb "Camaleón" <noelamac@gmail.com>: >El 2024-06-30 a las 11:33 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
And that in turn means, that your translation did not reached unstable, so the status page cannot "show it as fully translated", as you say above. (Those status show, what is currently in unstable !)
For this issue Helge already stated about some maintainers acting not optimal regarding translation update reports ...
Sadly!
Time is scarce, I do understand, but having a bug report with patch available opened for... 2 years? looks a bit overhelming :-)
El 2024-07-08 a las 22:57 +0200, Holger Wansing escribió:
So, in summary, the translation page seems fine currently, but translators >> have work to do again :-)
Well... let's hope (finally) so and translation page soon reflects the
job done! :-)
Hello Holger,
could you also check the status of the German "bacula" translation?
In https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00131.html
it was linked to bug 1074469, which is (unfortunately) still open.
On the .org pages it is still listed as untranslated (even though it
also had the previous stages of itt, rfr etc.).
Hi,
Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de> wrote (Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:09:16 +0000):
Hello Holger,
could you also check the status of the German "bacula" translation?
In https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00131.html
it was linked to bug 1074469, which is (unfortunately) still open.
On the .org pages it is still listed as untranslated (even though it
also had the previous stages of itt, rfr etc.).
The entry for bacula in https://i18n.debian.org/material/data/unstable.gz is:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package: bacula
Version: 13.0.4-3
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Bacula Team <pkg-bacula-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> PoolDir: main/b/bacula
Type: gnu
Upstream: dbs
Errors:
gettext: po/de.po:297:70: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:299:5: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:1767:25: invalid multibyte sequence
msgfmt: found 3 fatal errors
.
podebconf: file debian/po/templates.pot not up-to-date
PO:
po/bacula.pot!_!0t0f117u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_bacula.pot!!
po/de.po!de!0t0f0u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>!
po/es.po!es!80t27f11u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_es.po!Victor Hugo dos Santos <listas.vhs@gmail.com>!Bacula Spanish Team <bacula-users-es@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/es_AR.po!es_AR!0t0f2887u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_es_AR.po!<kern@sibbald.com>!Spanish
po/fi.po!fi!0t0f3178u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_fi.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>!Finnish <translation-team-fi@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/fr.po!fr!15t56f47u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_fr.po!Eric Bollengier <eric@eb.homelinux.org>!French <bacula-devel-fr@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/it.po!it!0t0f3102u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_it.po!<fparacchini@alteanet.it>!Italian <bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/nl.po!nl!23t22f73u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_nl.po!W. van den Akker <wvdakker@wilsoft.nl>!
po/pl.po!pl!1342t1026f921u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_pl.po!Grzegorz Grabowski <grzegorz@inteos.pl>!Inteos PL <pl@bacula.com.pl>
po/sv.po!sv!0t0f118u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_sv.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@bacula.org>!Swedish <bacula-devel@lists.soureforge.net>
po/uk.po!uk!36t29f53u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_uk.po!Vitaliy Kosharskiy <kisa_co@ukrpost.net>!Ukrainian
PODEBCONF:
debian/bacula-common.templates!_!!bacula_13.0.4-3_debian_bacula-common.templates
debian/po/templates.pot!_!0t0f7u!debian/po/bacula_13.0.4-3_templates.pot!! MENU:
debian/bacula-console.menu!bacula_13.0.4-3_bacula-console.menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So I guess that the fatal error for the de.po file is blocking further processing of that file, so that it does not reach the database for
the status pages.
Helge, Christoph:
You should double-check, if the file sent to bug #1074469 is syntax-wise ok (aka: if the above error is fixed in that file), so that this problem gets solved, as soon as the package maintainer includes that file into his package!
Otherwise, you don't get that problem out of the way forever...
Errors:The template bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po has just 80 lines.
gettext: po/de.po:297:70: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:299:5: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:1767:25: invalid multibyte sequence
msgfmt: found 3 fatal errors
Helge Kreutzmann <debian@helgefjell.de> wrote (Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:09:16 +0000):
Hello Holger,
could you also check the status of the German "bacula" translation?
In https://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-german/2024/06/msg00131.html
it was linked to bug 1074469, which is (unfortunately) still open.
On the .org pages it is still listed as untranslated (even though it
also had the previous stages of itt, rfr etc.).
The entry for bacula in https://i18n.debian.org/material/data/unstable.gz is:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package: bacula
Version: 13.0.4-3
Section: admin
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Debian Bacula Team <pkg-bacula-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> PoolDir: main/b/bacula
Type: gnu
Upstream: dbs
Errors:
gettext: po/de.po:297:70: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:299:5: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:1767:25: invalid multibyte sequence
msgfmt: found 3 fatal errors
.
podebconf: file debian/po/templates.pot not up-to-date
PO:
po/bacula.pot!_!0t0f117u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_bacula.pot!!
po/de.po!de!0t0f0u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>!
po/es.po!es!80t27f11u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_es.po!Victor Hugo dos Santos <listas.vhs@gmail.com>!Bacula Spanish Team <bacula-users-es@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/es_AR.po!es_AR!0t0f2887u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_es_AR.po!<kern@sibbald.com>!Spanish
po/fi.po!fi!0t0f3178u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_fi.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@sibbald.com>!Finnish <translation-team-fi@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/fr.po!fr!15t56f47u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_fr.po!Eric Bollengier <eric@eb.homelinux.org>!French <bacula-devel-fr@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/it.po!it!0t0f3102u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_it.po!<fparacchini@alteanet.it>!Italian <bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
po/nl.po!nl!23t22f73u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_nl.po!W. van den Akker <wvdakker@wilsoft.nl>!
po/pl.po!pl!1342t1026f921u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_pl.po!Grzegorz Grabowski <grzegorz@inteos.pl>!Inteos PL <pl@bacula.com.pl>
po/sv.po!sv!0t0f118u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_sv.po!Kern Sibbald <kern@bacula.org>!Swedish <bacula-devel@lists.soureforge.net>
po/uk.po!uk!36t29f53u!po/bacula_13.0.4-3_uk.po!Vitaliy Kosharskiy <kisa_co@ukrpost.net>!Ukrainian
PODEBCONF:
debian/bacula-common.templates!_!!bacula_13.0.4-3_debian_bacula-common.templates
debian/po/templates.pot!_!0t0f7u!debian/po/bacula_13.0.4-3_templates.pot!! MENU:
debian/bacula-console.menu!bacula_13.0.4-3_bacula-console.menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So I guess that the fatal error for the de.po file is blocking further processing of that file, so that it does not reach the database for
the status pages.
Helge, Christoph:
You should double-check, if the file sent to bug #1074469 is syntax-wise ok (aka: if the above error is fixed in that file), so that this problem gets solved, as soon as the package maintainer includes that file into his package!
Otherwise, you don't get that problem out of the way forever...
I have downloaded the file bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po from >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074469.
msgfmt -c bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po reports no errors.
Are there additional tests I can run?
I quote from above:
Errors:The template bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po has just 80 lines.
gettext: po/de.po:297:70: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:299:5: invalid multibyte sequence
po/de.po:1767:25: invalid multibyte sequence
msgfmt: found 3 fatal errors
I do not understand the meaning of the strings as 297:70.
If this are the line numbers and the column numbers, is it possible that
the issue is within gettext?
The last line of bacula_13.0.4-3_de.po is an empty line. Can this be an >issue?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 339 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 13:20:28 |
| Calls: | 7,505 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,710 |
| Messages: | 5,640,568 |
| Posted today: | 1 |