El 20/11/23 a las 10:43, Thomas Lange escribió:
I'm still not sure which of the languages we need or which are just
bugs in packages. Or do we have bug in the scripts, that generat this language list?
What about the AA_BB and AA@somestring languages?
For e.g. I wonder why we have international/l10n/po/man_DE
which links only to this po file: https://i18n.debian.org/material/po/unstable/main/i/i2p/installer/resources/locale-man/i2p_0.9.48-1.1_man_de.po.gz
This po file cleary says
"Language: de\n"
Why is the language then called man_DE and not just "de"? Is this a
bug in our scripts?
I think this is a bug, because those po files are named man_ because they
are translations of the manual pages, not because of the Mandingo language.
"Similar" thing happens with https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/bos_DE (and all other bos_XX links in https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/): they are translations files of the boswars package, having two translations
templates, one named boswars_version_xx.po.gz and another one named boswars_version_bos_xx.po.gz, so that "bos" is misdetected as Bosnian language.
thanks for all the feedback. It seems that there's more work to do
than I've expected. Currently I will not work on fixing the po
statistics, because I want to concentrate on the security pages.
So, if anyone else likes to work on this, feel free to do so.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 23:39:09 +0100, Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> said:
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 344 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 102:05:41 |
Calls: | 7,540 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,723 |
Messages: | 5,647,372 |