• Re: Debian Updates

    From Andrey Rahmatullin@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 8 12:10:02 2022
    If someone wants to answer, they should first check previous threads here started by the same person.

    --
    WBR, wRAR

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmKgctwtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh jUgP/A7W3PHo6ks9aQXXRZgtsXbbPFBuClbK4wfcGLr5Th0Lkic4eWIZp6LfV7nE dcxlBUJE8HwmfOTIriADmeQXr8oUtDt4nPz4+csrAk7tJya20suodlR9p1724OiL ABkER6AmkqAQ4/QTlM/8wzwKQ9hjwJ2JrSSMfSnf1Pv/hRsc5Nudm8bN3Of6EBoa k2Pj9kGBspYlR4XMeaLlo9eLrS5U383Di37ccVNO99jeloc3FbRXyeWRDN0f3zBX 8I/fiIUDjCWde2OihFF9neKPAN/gQ2Wrm1nEV/PrQERztdQqNrUT6jdP+du+plhg tDy7x8w7fCFwI4SRCSaBGqoBdV2XE1TQckI1DyF99mzAWk7Ygah6ExI0qukPY3QV dPmIbs/o+XQr5cKQWd99hSzt2gwXHVRsBRMIB0dmFY9QPWbcrnXm6u5JepAl5cm0 S3L8pMKNzEvd5r1Q3qdrBTgMrrn8umpZkECqNiEdq4FMiM/YffxLg4/PL1CIYd98 bWReDqLKHuZpk3ohHfTBX26mX0yadEah1cIZY6FaEkzhxai0Ik/iJKd7HOmDpnGv PkYDPdCLQYh2R4BGjAv8L2NS6XGyDJA3v4nv4xeP/5prd7RasQKmyKHjA3ldmXu9 jAp6kA3vYxtzzY0D2zYG7I4tsT/Ceyrd4CBKAehrAqBaOYfM
    =aOFq
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From phil995511 -@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 8 12:00:01 2022
    Hello,

    Debian 11.4 have almost a month late ?

    https://release.debian.org/

    Kernel version 5.17.6-1+b1: amd64 which has been in SID for about a month
    still hasn't been released in Testing ??

    https://packages.debian.org/fr/linux-image-amd64

    Kernel version 5.18 has still not been offered in SID, while Kernel version 5.19 has already been released in RC1 ??

    https://www.kernel.org/

    What is the problem ?? Do you lack volunteers ? Do you need help moving
    these projects forward as normal ??

    It would be desirable that Debian be generally updated more often at the
    level of Internet browsers which all present security flaws in Debian
    Stable.

    It would be desirable for Linux Kernels to be updated more often for
    security and hardware compatibility reasons in SID, Testing, and Stable... Kernels published in BackPorts should be automatically integrated into
    future versions 11.4, 11.5, etc.

    We are no longer in the 1990s/2000s, security problems are becoming more
    and more important, and must be taken care of very quickly so that the
    machines are not potentially hacked...

    Debian absolutely must find a new rhythm / breath to deal effectively with
    the security flaws present in this distribution.

    Regards.

    <div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>Debian 11.4 haveĀ almost a month late ?</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://release.debian.org/">https://release.debian.org/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Kernel version 5.17.6-1+b1: amd64 which has been
    in SID for about a month still hasn&#39;t been released in Testing ??<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://packages.debian.org/fr/linux-image-amd64">https://packages.debian.org/fr/linux-image-amd64</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Kernel version
    5.18 has still not been offered in SID, while Kernel version 5.19 has already been released in RC1 ??<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.kernel.org/">https://www.kernel.org/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>What is the problem ?? Do you
    lack volunteers ? Do you need help moving these projects forward as normal ??<br></div><div><br></div><div>It would be desirable that Debian be generally updated more often at the level of Internet browsers which all present security flaws in Debian
    Stable.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It would be desirable for Linux Kernels to be updated more often for security and hardware compatibility reasons in SID, Testing, and Stable... Kernels published in BackPorts should be automatically integrated into
    future versions 11.4, 11.5, etc.<br></div><div><br></div><div>We are no longer in the 1990s/2000s, security problems are becoming more and more important, and must be taken care of very quickly so that the machines are not potentially hacked...<br><br>
    Debian absolutely must find a new rhythm / breath to deal effectively with the security flaws present in this distribution.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards.</div></div>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sam Hartman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 8 18:20:01 2022
    "phil995511" == phil995511 <- <phil995511@gmail.com>> writes:


    phil995511> Do you lack volunteers ? Do you
    phil995511> need help moving these projects forward as normal ??

    Hi.
    You have received answers to similar questions in the past that focus on
    how Debian works, and I do not wish to engage again.
    It would be easy to read your questions as confrontational, and I hope
    that's not the case.
    One of the great things about Debian is that it is a community and if
    you wish things were better, you can work toward that.

    So, my question to you: are you trying to contribute to Debian and
    running into any challenges doing so?
    Are there areas where you're trying to help things move more quickly and running into trouble getting involved?

    Similarly, are there people you know trying to contribute to Debian and
    running into trouble?

    If so, I'd be interested in understanding the problems/challenges
    you/they are facing.
    I'd like to see if there is anything I can do to help out.

    Sam Hartman
    Debian Developer

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

    iHUEARYIAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCYqDJdwAKCRAsbEw8qDeG dHk/AQDJ44QiElaWn/jx4ycJj6IzoY5KGwr6eQqiUwF5CGRF9gD/VJUz4ayItvbb 87Z8EiXPRCQeFFpmbY+A7IM5gnGXrgQ=
    =SQVb
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)