in addition, arm64 is usually speculative OoO (Cavium ThunderX V1
being a notable exception) which means it's vulnerable to spectre and meltdown attacks, whereas 32-bit ARM is exclusively in-order. if you
want to GUARANTEE that you've got spectre-immune hardware you need
either any 32-bit system (where even Cortex A7 has virtualisattion) or
if 64-bit is absolutely required use Cortex A53.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 08:11:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Niels Thykier:
armel/armhf:
------------
* Undesirable to keep the hardware running beyond 2020. armhf VM
support uncertain. (DSA)
- Source: [DSA Sprint report]
Fedora is facing an issue running armhf under virtualization on arm64:
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572916>
I think you mean:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576593
I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures should have better, more robust support from the Debian project.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 437 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 186:56:03 |
Calls: | 9,135 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,429 |
Messages: | 6,034,908 |