• debian-installer FTBFS after openssl transition

    From John Paul Adrian Glaubitz@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 24 09:40:01 2022
    Hi!

    I have observed debian-installer on some architectures such m68k, powerpc and sparc64
    after the openssl transition. The issue does not affect all architectures, ia64, hppa
    and ppc64 are not affected, for example.

    The failure looks like this:

    Building dependency tree... Done
    libcrypto3-udeb:powerpc Depends on libatomic1:powerpc < none @un H > can't be satisfied!
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
    requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
    distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
    or been moved out of Incoming.
    The following information may help to resolve the situation:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
    libcrypto3-udeb : Depends: libatomic1 but it is not installable
    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

    Anyone have any suggestion what could be the problem? Since another version of the openssl
    package was just uploaded, I don't think we need another binNMU here.

    Adrian

    --
    .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
    : :' : Debian Developer
    `. `' Physicist
    `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Julien Cristau@21:1/5 to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz on Tue May 24 11:00:01 2022
    On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 09:30:46AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
    Hi!

    I have observed debian-installer on some architectures such m68k, powerpc and sparc64
    after the openssl transition. The issue does not affect all architectures, ia64, hppa
    and ppc64 are not affected, for example.

    The failure looks like this:

    Building dependency tree... Done
    libcrypto3-udeb:powerpc Depends on libatomic1:powerpc < none @un H > can't be satisfied!
    Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
    requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
    or been moved out of Incoming.
    The following information may help to resolve the situation:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
    libcrypto3-udeb : Depends: libatomic1 but it is not installable
    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

    Anyone have any suggestion what could be the problem? Since another version of the openssl
    package was just uploaded, I don't think we need another binNMU here.

    Presumably libatomic needs to start building a udeb and openssl needs to
    be rebuilt against that.

    Cheers,
    Julien

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)