Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2021-07-23):

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200):

From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather

arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release,
since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this
is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something?

You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the
l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt?

see partman-auto's recipe change *not* be included as I have no idea
about the scope of this change. Branching bullseye at the last tag, cherry-picking l10n updates on top of it, and releasing from that
branch would have my preference. If that's the only thing that seems
fishy, I can take care of that particular upload if you'd like.

The recipe changes in partman-auto seem to be powerpc-only, so it's
also not relevant for bullseye release, right?

I wasn't sure initially, hence my pointing this out. Having built the
package from the latest tag and from master, using -apowerpc and
-appc64el respectively, I've confirmed that the contents do change for
powerpc (which we can ignore) and don't change for ppc64el (which we
would care about).

So happy to see this one get uploaded too.


Your recent uploads haven't made it to the mirrors yet due to some fun
on the ftp-master side, I think; but hopefully I'll be able to hint them
all when $sync happens. :)

Thanks for the swift uploads!


Näkemiin,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmD7WNQACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSBcOw//cPc7DsnxTZBJYX/hawwa1w9ggtA2HQbygSpzaw62OsFiMCkOjbwRqBrN fRQplzY5N4h9K0Ot/utSct4zFbq++Dpiapy3IUyLDnpI+p2YsxvMgI2UzYiiV4N0 pH522xNLwMzLjlRvKR3/2MKA4Wo7sszDXFV0tgXtwTHbGOLtYJOD4MBjFrHv1FPZ //TtwmmT1xum0+Rs9oksqKbTzyiR5uFGo/65Is7mJuu9t8ZDlzoZ6Ty2SGto3bYR D7me4wfBEIlFsQCYeKCF7ziZ8XQzzeIC4tvJg3vwWt4bwGDPrLwIZIJoh5DVKbmb x2rM4VGy1DYXHKZ71YNw4L6RkP9QTbCgdm1UtV0uTM0FLFH+iW15JBTi36Uo79HB J+4XRdx/apwwXewYEg7mod9l2TowS+T5vjzSi1n9ZbLvsBok15gQsCYrjclsk1s5 RDvRPGltIEuKgRfnK1wbNiGEghgTbaWB55JTD/biGNXCFk/Xcs/6vGaF42cM2aSM hnuLLLermugNusHvKHmDE7DoPSwgX6DzuMHIB26VkxVXwPGLL6mres6arUefq6Tc Y2qJs7PcYisw6hEXCBidJERqd4llNWzdAzvx+MIt294kwXUuNYcpJyVeg/C0xTeE MinO+L5dZ11Rafy4s2y+CrmTZLQGA2lGq6AZpEu7p+4jAboLc6A=
=5x51
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
*

Hi,

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200):

Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2021-07-23):

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200):

From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather

arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release,
since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this
is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something?

You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the
l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt?

Will look into this.

see partman-auto's recipe change *not* be included as I have no idea about the scope of this change. Branching bullseye at the last tag, cherry-picking l10n updates on top of it, and releasing from that
branch would have my preference. If that's the only thing that seems fishy, I can take care of that particular upload if you'd like.

The recipe changes in partman-auto seem to be powerpc-only, so it's
also not relevant for bullseye release, right?

I wasn't sure initially, hence my pointing this out. Having built the
package from the latest tag and from master, using -apowerpc and
-appc64el respectively, I've confirmed that the contents do change for powerpc (which we can ignore) and don't change for ppc64el (which we
would care about).

So happy to see this one get uploaded too.

Your recent uploads haven't made it to the mirrors yet due to some fun
on the ftp-master side, I think; but hopefully I'll be able to hint them
all when $sync happens. :)

Thanks for the swift uploads!

I uploaded partman-base today, I needed to wait for yesterday's l10n-sync run, to get the latest update for this one.


Holger



--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2021-07-24):

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200):

Your recent uploads haven't made it to the mirrors yet due to some
fun on the ftp-master side, I think; but hopefully I'll be able to
hint them all when $sync happens. :)

They were hinted this morning, and have migrated. And thanks to the tags
pushed this morning, calc-release-status confirms:

- fi is fully translated

I uploaded partman-base today, I needed to wait for yesterday's
l10n-sync run, to get the latest update for this one.

Hinted as well. It doesn't impact the translation-status file as the
only change is an updated msgstr, which wasn't marked fuzzy or anything.

Thanks!


Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmD8XnoACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSAp4w//T6ZBETl5REbtab+VcQhpMWUNpS4gg62nx2fW3VLxisVmfGlt7aSfGZkZ Me8pDQvTV91Xnhg3OBHdcFO3vVyFXmbhjRQg5IjhSM2VNB6XTV/bHdZgJIPmzW9O 5m+1BK3epPv4EwyVAgR27ul24Ds13cwGrT+qkWkjrHjY6orMxlceN83YylGwausA IFlb+7SxxzGk3/jWHfw70xqzJQSr+aOe7nSdv/z6fjbPUwdauVMGLdVIiOx3km7Q 1dbu9FJEsgtGe4HGi00PWoaebqApTvl2BETK6snWOvSIV8OVBpNHsVhf+dJlNiB0 SAwspgrZtN1UJgk0hW+kBVXUg5JzRy2Wd6dLeHTf3c8ICgL3POfY5bgRKaEuQFoI 6ZTwkaLDW5noKOyf9Zftij1E8ko4NSNqe6Ajr4ngwwlEfqQ71b+M3HsI5pEoLyWv dYwPCQdLcRc8Yd8pkpEzCtPGNMxtDX+ZIuDXszoGrtqM8sPGsoo9FysG4ygqSLFG i0g8TNhCCoXkRjkw4rw7s514f5t4nmKMgZkNwGtWGji0rYwx4bHzq2WptuVdm63L LbnsH4/1xLZHQWEtIWKfsdzandX8UzLAoZ5p5ISjJ1XdqHuaMElJA4ZPIcLhiwLV W8yd/++yQ2mJNJxp70RYl8vyA+SGzB7IeWRmUTLFXzjUgTHgO8w=
=gLZm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
*

Hi,

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Sat, 24 Jul 2021 02:03:35 +0200):

Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2021-07-23):

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote (Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:11:44 +0200):

From a quick look around, based on [1], it seems arcboot-installer has a non-l10n change but that seems harmless (Uploaders update); I'd rather

arcboot-installer is no longer relevant for the bullseye release,
since it's mips arch, which is no release arch for bullseye (and this
is why I ignored that for months already), or did I miss something?

You're absolutely right; maybe we should retire this package from the
l10n machinery, so that it no longer shows up in translations.txt?

I have now introduced a change on that:
the script for generation of translations.txt now uses the list of l10n- relevant D-I packages in packages/po/packages_list.

So the above issue should be gone now.


Holger



--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)