Hi,
Until now, https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ has been holding 30 days >worth of daily builds for all architectures, which needs almost 100G.
This could be kept as is if that's desired (DSA would need to allocate a >little more space to some hosts to make monitoring happy).
But seeing how we managed to ship big regressions (remember cdebconf vs. >gtk…) for months without noticing, I'm wondering whether 15 days
wouldn't be sufficient anyway… Worst case, interested users could build
any older d-i using snapshot.debian.org (see SNAPSHOT_TS), against the >distribution of their choosing.
What do you think?
Sounds fine for me. I don't tend to care for things older than the
last week at most.
Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> (2021-08-18):
Sounds fine for me. I don't tend to care for things older than the
last week at most.
Thanks for your feedback.
I've implemented the change, it can be revisited if we get more feedback
and sane reasons to stick to 30 days:
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/commit/368454cfd0236ced920b309aa0f6808446e4beda
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 293 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 219:03:02 |
Calls: | 6,621 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 12,171 |
Messages: | 5,317,788 |